I. About Propionibacterium
A. Slow growing Gram positive bacillus that form C02 bubbles in
Swiss cheese and acne in adolescents
B. Feed on fatty acids and produce propionic acid, hence their name
C. Facultative anaerobes - can live in the absence or presence of
atmospheric oxygen
D. Most familiar is P. Acnes,
but there are other important subtypes of Propionibacterium
including P. humerusii; different
subtypes may have different interactions with human host environments.
E. SKIN IS NOT STERILE – Propionibacterium is not on us, it’s in us
1. Part of the normal commensal flora accounting fora large portion of the skin microbiota living on and in healthy adult skin; rarely
found in preadolescents
2. Most numerous on the skin of
the face, chest and back of males - the oily, not the wet environment
F. FRIEND OR FOE?
1. FOE: Gene products include digestive enzymes and pore-forming factors
that can degrade host molecules and facilitate the growth of opportunistic
bacteria, such as coagulase negative Staphylococcus.
2. FOE: May trigger insidious tissue damage (such as bone resorption
leading to loosening, or capsular thickening leading to stiffness).
3.
FOE: Forms biofilms on metal, plastic, cement and in membranes surrounding implants.
Biofilms are viscoelastic extracellular slime layers consisting of
polysaccharides, extracellular DNA, proteins and lipids that resist detachment
and can move across surfaces. These biofilms develop channels allowing for
diffusion of nutrients to the embedded bacteria and provide a range of niche
environments from aerobic on the surface to anaerobic at the depth. Bacteria in
biofilms behave differently from those in the free-floating form and are
protected from host defenses by forming conglomerates too large for
inflammatory cell phagocytosis and by creating a diffusion barrier that
prevents antibodies and antibiotics from reaching the bacteria. If the biofilm is disturbed, it
may shed free-floating bacteria than can lead to a more obvious infection.
Bacteria in biofilms are difficult to culture and difficult to eradicate. Even while embedded in a biofilm, bacteria may still induce bone resorption by activating macrophages and osteoclasts.
Strains with pili (P. Avidum, P Humerusii) seem to be better biofilm formers (see A, B, C below; D is P. Acnes with no pili).
4. FRIEND: Close relatives of Streptomyces which have been used to produce two-thirds
of the clinically useful antibiotics of natural origin, including
aminoglycosides (neomycin, streptomycin), anthracyclines, chloramphenicol,
macrolide, and tetracyclines.
5. FRIEND: Modulate the host immune system, for example by
inducing cutaneous interferon and interleukin-producing T cells
6. ?FRIEND: Is the low incidence of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus
Aureus, Streptococcus, and E. Coli infections in the shoulder (in comparison to
hip and knee arthroplasty) due to a protective effect from products secreted by
and enhanced host
immunity induced by Propionibacterium?
II. Propionibacterium
and shoulder arthroplasty
A. DON’T BLOW IT OFF AS A
‘CONTAMINANT’
1. The most common bacterium to be
recovered at surgical revision of a failed arthroplasty
2. Also seen after failed fracture fixation, failed cuff repair, and
Latarjet procedures
3. Risk Factors for Propionibacterium infection
include male sex, young age, reverse total shoulder, arthroplasty for trauma
and prior surgery or prior injection.
III. Preventing Propionibacterium
from entering the surgical field
A. YOU CAN’T DO IT.
1. Skin preparation cannot sterilize the dermis
2. Skin incisions must transect hair bulbs and sebaceous glands
containing Propionibacterium.
3. First time shoulder surgery wounds (including scopes) can be culture
positive for Propionibacterium in
spite of surgical skin preparation and systemic antibiotics.
B. ASSUME THEY ARE IN YOUR WOUND
– DEAL WITH IT.
1.
Assure the skin of the extremity is healthy before taking patient to the OR
2. Pre-incision IV Prophylaxis with Ceftriaxone 2 gm X 1 and Vancomycin 1 gm q 12 h X 2
3. Careful preparation and draping to minimize surgical contact with
skin surface onto which Propionibacterium
flow from the dermal glands
4. Discard skin knife
5. Consider using hot knife for dermal incision to cauterize the exposed
surface
6. Minimize contact of surgical tools and implants with wound edge
7. Minimize open wound time
8. Copious irrigation with saline containing Ceftriaxone and Vancomycin
(dilution is the solution to pollution)
9. Handle the prosthesis in a way that avoids contact with the skin edge
10. Avoid drains (= two way street)
11. Personal exhaust (space) suits do not address the risk of Propionibacterium from the patient's skin.
11. Personal exhaust (space) suits do not address the risk of Propionibacterium from the patient's skin.
IV. Clinical presentation of Propionibacterium infection
A.
STEALTHY – IF YOU’RE LOOKING FOR SIGNS
OF INFECTION, YOU’LL MISS IT.
1. Propionibacterium exerts
its effects by enzymatic and chemical means, rather by inciting the
inflammatory response we’re used to looking for
2. Because Propionibacterium does
not usually incite inflammation, the CBC, ESR, CRP, interleukin-6,
joint aspiration, white cells/high power field, gram stain, are - more often than not – normal and calor,
rubor, dolor and tumor are absent
3. Propionibacterium
infections may present months or years after the index arthroplasty with
symptoms of unexplained pain, stiffness or component loosening appearing long
after the usual ‘worry period’ for infection is over. YOU SNOOZE, YOU LOSE.
4.
Perhaps the best suggestion of a Propionibacterium
infection is the history of an initially successful arthroplasty with good
recovery of comfort and function that is followed by an otherwise unexplained
increase in pain and stiffness.
5. Suspicion of Propionibacterium infection should be
heightened in male patients who develop delayed problems with otherwise
unexplained stiffness, pain, component loosening, or osteolysis.
6. POSITIVE CULURES ARE NOT
‘UNEXPECTED’ IN REVISION ARTHROPLASTY. Almost 50% of revisions for failed
shoulder arthroplasty have positive deep cultures, most of which are positive
for Propionibacterium. In spite of
having performed hundreds of these cases, I still can’t tell which ones will
have floridly positive tissue and explant cultures for Propionibacterium. Of course, those shoulders with cloudy fluid,
osteolysis, periprosthetic membrane, and component loosening are more likely to
be culture positive.
V. Recovering Propionibacterium from surgical sites. THE USUAL ROUTINE WILL MISS
THEM.
A. There a many reasons that Propionibacterium
in the tissue and explants may be overlooked in revision arthroplasty
surgery, leading to the mistaken diagnosis of ‘aseptic’ failure
1. Cultures may not be sent
2. Multiple cultures of tissue and hardware may not be sent (TAKE FIVE)
3. Cultures may not be observed for at least 17 days
4. Specimens may not be submitted for culturing on aerobic and anaerobic
media
5. Preoperative antibiotics may suppress growth in culture
B. Bacteria in biofilms may be difficult to recover
1. Joint fluid aspiration can miss the presence of bacteria concealed in
a biofilm
2. Bacteria in biofilms may transform to a dormant or slow growing
phenotype that is not revealed in cultures.
3. Bacteria in biofilms may not be dislodged from the prosthesis by
conventional culturing methods. Sonication may help.
4. Endonucleases and other host factors may prevent the Propionibacterium from growing.
C. Can other methods help?
1. Broad-range 16S rRNA gene multiplex PCR
2. Immunohistology
VI. Treating Propionibacterium
infections. GO RED IF YOU WANT THEM DEAD.
A.
Difficult or impossible for
antibiotics to kill Propionibacterium in
a biofilm. Surest way is prosthesis exchange. Retaining a biofilm-coated
implant may predispose the shoulder to persistent infection
B.
The decision between the ‘yellowprotocol’ (prosthesis retention, oral Augmentin until cultures are finalized)
and the ‘red protocol’ (single stage exchange of all components, PICC line, six
weeks of IV Ceftriaxone and Vancomycin, possible addition of Rifampin until
culture results finalized, one year oral Augmentin) needs to be made at surgery
before culture results are known.
C.
Single stage exchange appears to be
effective without the obligatory return to the OR that comes with the use of a
spacer. New humeral component is fixed by impaction grafting with Vancomycin –
soaked cancellous allograft.
D.
Two-stage exchange with a temporary
spacer is complication-ladened and appears unnecessary.
E.
If cultures are negative at three
weeks, antibiotics are discontinued. If cultures are positive, our infectious
disease service will advise Ceftriaxone and/or Vancomycin, possibly with Rifampin.
F.
We do not routinely use Clindamycin
because of increasing Propionibacterium resistance
and the heightened risk of Clostridium difficile colitis
VII.
How do we know if the treatment worked? ONLY IN THE FULLNESS OF TIME.
A.
Since the presence of Propionibacterium cannot be reliably
detected without open tissue biopsies and since the clinical symptoms of
persistent infection may take years to manifest themselves, the success or
failure of treatment cannot be known with confidence.
B.
The surest evidence of treatment
failure is if the patient comes to a second revision at which Propionibacterium are again recovered.
C.
We can be relatively confident that
the treatment has been successful if the patient has durable restoration of the
comfort and function of the revised shoulder.
D.
The problem is that there are many
patients who have incomplete restoration of comfort and function after the
surgical revision of a failed shoulder arthroplasty and we cannot know if the
residual problems are due to persistent infection or to other non-infectious
issues with the soft tissues, the bone or the implants.
E.
We wish we had a surefire way to
answer the patient’s question “after all this treatment, how do I know that the
infection is cured?”
VIII. Relevant References from the
University of Washington
Butler-Wu, S.M., D. J. Sengupta, et al. (2011). "Genome sequence of a novel species,Propionibacterium humerusii." J Bacteriol 193(14): 3678.
Hou, C., Gupta, A., et al. (2015). "How do revised shoulders that are culture positive for propionibacterium differ from those that are not?' J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Sep;24(9):1427-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Feb 25.PMID: 25725967
Hou, C., Gupta, A., et al. (2015). "How do revised shoulders that are culture positive for propionibacterium differ from those that are not?' J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Sep;24(9):1427-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Feb 25.PMID: 25725967
Matsen, F. A.,3rd, S. Butler-Wu, et al. (2013). "Origin of propionibacterium in surgicalwounds and evidence-based approach for culturing propionibacterium fromsurgical sites." J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(23): e1811-7.
Matsen, F. A., 3rd, Russ, S.M, et al. (2014). "Propionibacterium can be isolated from deep cultures obtained at primary arthroplasty despite intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis." J Shoulder Elbow Surg. Published Online: December 26, 2014
Matsen, F. A., 3rd, Russ, S.M, et al. (2014). "Propionibacterium can be isolated from deep cultures obtained at primary arthroplasty despite intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis." J Shoulder Elbow Surg. Published Online: December 26, 2014
===
Consultation for those who live a distance away from Seattle.
Click here to see the new Shoulder Arthritis Book
Click here to see the new Rotator Cuff Book
To see the topics covered in this Blog, click here
Click here to see the new Rotator Cuff Book
To see the topics covered in this Blog, click here
Use the "Search" box to the right to find other topics of interest to you.
You may be interested in some of our most visited web pages including:shoulder arthritis, total shoulder, ream and run, reverse total shoulder, CTA arthroplasty, and rotator cuff surgery as well as the 'ream and run essentials'
You may be interested in some of our most visited web pages including:shoulder arthritis, total shoulder, ream and run, reverse total shoulder, CTA arthroplasty, and rotator cuff surgery as well as the 'ream and run essentials'