Saturday, October 19, 2019

Posterior bone grafting to "correct" glenoid bone loss - is it worth it?

Outcomes of Posterior Glenoid Bone-Grafting in Anatomical Total Shoulder Arthroplasty A Systematic Review

The authors suggest that posterior glenoid bone loss presents a unique challenge with an increased risk of glenoid component failure. They conducted a systematic review of six studies reporting posterior glenoid bone-grafting to address the bone loss in patients undergoing anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty; the average followup was 5.7 years.

While 57% of the patients had an excellent postoperative Neer score, 28.7% had evidence of radiolucency and 35% had humeral head subluxation or instability. Thirteen patients (14%) underwent revision of the glenoid component by the time of the latest follow-up. Complications included component loosening, graft failure, subluxation, dislocation, broken screws, axillary nerve injury, infection and stiffness.

Comment: Posterior glenoid bone grafting is a technically difficult procedure for addressing posterior bone loss that has a substantial failure rate. In some cases this treatment may be worse than the disease. For example recent work has shown that B2 glenoids and glenoids with retroversion > 15 degrees can be satisfactorily managed with a standard glenoid component without bone graft and without the complications and revisions associated with bone grafting (see this link).  Surgeons need to ask what pathoanatomy justifies using a bone graft.

=====
To see our new series of youtube videos on important shoulder surgeries and how they are done, click here.

Use the "Search" box to the right to find other topics of interest to you.


You may be interested in some of our most visited web pages  arthritis, total shoulder, ream and runreverse total shoulderCTA arthroplasty, and rotator cuff surgery as well as the 'ream and run essentials'