Super bowl - Superb owl

.

FYI, another name for an Osprey is a Sea Hawk

Be there!

Follow on twitter/X: https://x.com/RickMatsen
Follow on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/shoulder.arthritis
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rick-matsen-88b1a8133/

 

The Bad B2 Pandemic Continues - by now, you can guess the treatment we selected.

Here's a case from last week: 40 year old very active man with these x-rays 

From the white board in the OR, ROM under general anesthesia

Thus we have the familiar B2 paradox: a posteriorly decentered, unstable shoulder that is also stiff (FE -forward elevagion; ER - external rotation at the side; ERA - external rotation in abduction; IRA - internal rotation in abduction; CBA - cross body adduction (distance from antecubital fossa of surgical arm to contralateral acromion in cm)).

From the responses to the Jan 29 post, many surgeons would consider a reverse total shoulder, or an anatomic total shoulder with a posterior augment.

Our preop preview suggested a 50 20 humeral head. A preoperative CT was not obtained.

As usual the procedure was performed under a general anesthesia without nerve block. The shoulder was approached through a subscapularis peel, preserving the long head tendon of the biceps.

At surgery, the glenoid was biconcave in the posterior inferior direction (ellipse) rather than directly posterior with respect to superior / inferior axis (yellow line). This pathoanatomy would have been difficult to fit using an augmented glenoid component without excessive bone removal.

The glenoid was conservatively reamed to a monoconcavity without attempting to change glenoid version.

A short humeral stem was inserted.

As pointed out in prior posts, the key is not a preoperative plan or attempting to match a preoperative plan with expensive technology (e.g. robotics, patient specific instruments, virtual reality, or augmented reality). These approaches do not recognize the importance of soft tissue balancing. 

Instead, we use intraoperative decision-making after osteophyte resection and appropriate tissue releases that recognize the soft tissues' and the implants' combined contributions to the shoulder's mobility and stability.

Trialing with the standard 50 20 head revealed excessive soft tissue tightness on the 150, 40, 50, 60 tests. Trialing with the strandard 50 18 head revealed excessive posterior translation.

Trialing with the anterioly eccentric 50 18 head revealed excellent balance of stability and mobility (160 FF, ER 20, IRA 60, 50% posterior translation). 

His postoperartive range of flexion is shown here

His recovery room films are shown here

For comparison, here's his preoperative axillary 'truth' view (note the standardization of the projection and arm position)

We will start assisted flexion at 2 weeks post op.

See also the case at the top of this page under the W

It's all about balance

Black-necked Stilt

Malheur National Wildlife Refuge

Spring 2025

Follow on twitter/X: https://x.com/RickMatsen
Follow on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/shoulder.arthritis
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rick-matsen-88b1a8133/

Here are some videos that are of shoulder interest
Shoulder arthritis - what you need to know (see this link).
How to x-ray the shoulder (see this link).
The ream and run procedure (see this link)
The total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link)
The cuff tear arthropathy arthroplasty (see this link).
The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The smooth and move procedure for irreparable rotator cuff tears (see this link)

Shoulder rehabilitation exercises (see this link). 

The Bad B2 in active patients - the ream and run using the anteriorly eccentric humeral head to recenter the joint.

The Bad B2 glenoid is frequently encountered in our arthroplasty practice. In a previous post I presented the two cases of quality of life limiting Bad B2 pathoanatomy below for thoughts on management. Options included reverse total shoulder, anatomic total shoulder without or with augmented glenoids or bone grafting, and various types of hemiarthroplasty. 

Each patient was treated with the classic ream and run using an anteriorly eccentric humeral head to re-center the posteriorly unstable articulation. No preoperative CT scan or 3D planning were used in either case. The procedures were performed under general anesthesia without a plexus block. The long head tendon of the biceps was preserved in both cases. The subscapularis was peeled and repaired with six fiberwire sutures and a mild rotator interval closure.

Coincidentally, both patients returned for their two-year followups on the same day. Both reported the ability to perform each of the 12 functions of the Simple Shoulder Test. Both had strong subscapularis function.

51 year old active man

64 year old active man

Cutting to the chase

Scissor-tailed Flycatcher

Austin, Texas

 2025

Follow on twitter/X: https://x.com/RickMatsen
Follow on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/shoulder.arthritis
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rick-matsen-88b1a8133/

The Bad B2 - a challenge. What would you do?

The Bad B2 glenoid is frequently encountered in our arthroplasty practice. How would you manage each of these two cases? Respond on LinkedIn.

51 year old active man

64 year old active man

Follow on twitter/X: https://x.com/RickMatsen
Follow on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/shoulder.arthritis
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rick-matsen-88b1a8133/

Reverse total shoulder - hear the experts from ASES

ASES will provide a Virtual Journal Club on Reverse Total Shoulder, Tuesday, January 27th at 7pm CST, featuring moderators Drs. Christopher Klifto and Eric Wagner and panelists: Drs. Emilie Cheung, Larry Gulotta and Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo (click on this link).

Here are some recent posts regarding the articles to be featured in the journal club

American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Journal Club on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty - a reflections on the articles. Part 1

Conjoint Tendon Release in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Journal Club on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty - a reflections on the articles. Part 2

Humeral component retroversion in RSA American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Journal Club on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty - a reflections on the articles. Part 3

Follow on twitter/X: https://x.com/RickMatsen
Follow on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/shoulder.arthritis
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rick-matsen-88b1a8133/

Humeral component retroversion in RSA American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Journal Club on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty - a reflections on the articles. Part 3

One of the less frequently studied surgeon-controlled variables in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is the version of the humeral component. Humeral component retroversion in the Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder System arthroplasty: rotations, clinical outcomes, and quality-of-life analysis in a prospective randomized study: 60 patients were randomized; 57 analyzed at 24 months, mean age 75, 85% female, massive rotator cuff tear (63.3%), rotator cuff arthropathy (23.3%), primary osteoarthritis (13.3%) having RSA with Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder System by an individual surgeon. 

30° retroversion improved external rotation at 0° abduction by 12° but compromised functional outcomes as revealed by the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) and quality of life (SF-12 PCS) compared to 0° retroversion. Functional internal rotation showed only marginal improvement with 0° retroversion (approximately one spinal level).

The 0° group achieved clinically significantly higher SST scores, and superior quality of life in the physical domain, despite reduced external rotation with the arm at the side.

No significant differences were detected in ASES or Constant-Murley scores. These instruments may be less sensitive than the SST to the specific functional trade-offs between rotation patterns. The SST asks practical questions: Can you sleep comfortably? Carry 10 pounds? Wash the opposite shoulder? These activities may benefit from the subtle balance achieved at 0° retroversion with this implant.

It is worthy of note that the Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder System is a highly lateralized design. Thesse results may not apply to medialized designs, different glenosphere sizes, or varying humeral shaft angles. The interaction between retroversion and lateralization remains unexplored.

Conclusion: With Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder System laateralized design implant:

1. 30° retroversion increases ER at the side by 12° (clinically significant) but does not improve ER in abduction or functional ER scoring.

2. 0° retroversion provides only marginal internal rotation improvement that falls short of clinical significance and challenges computational model predictions.

3. The Simple Shoulder Test and SF-12, by assessing actual task performance and perceived quality of life, provide insight into what patients actually experience—which may differ substantially from what surgeons measure.

4. 0° retroversion achieves superior Simple Shoulder Test scores and physical quality of life despite less ER at the side, suggesting better integration of motion patterns for activities of daily living.

It not known if  these findings apply to medialized systems, different glenosphere sizes, or varying humeral shaft angles. Each implant design may have an optimal version range requiring separate study.

The study also highlights the importance of patient-reported outcomes in arthroplasty research. Goniometric measurements of range of motion, while objective and quantifiable, capture only one dimension of shoulder function. The Simple Shoulder Test and SF-12, by assessing actual task performance and perceived quality of life, provide insight into what patients actually experience—which may differ substantially from what surgeons measure.

Finally, this work reminds us that surgical decision-making remains complex and incompletely understood. The interaction of multiple variables—implant design, soft tissue management, bone morphology, patient factors—creates a multivariate problem that defies simple solutions.

Progress requires well-designed studies like this one, asking focused questions with rigorous methodology, gradually building the evidence base that will guide future practice.

Follow on twitter/X: https://x.com/RickMatsen
Follow on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/shoulder.arthritis
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rick-matsen-88b1a8133/

Here are some videos that are of shoulder interest
Shoulder arthritis - what you need to know (see this link).
How to x-ray the shoulder (see this link).
The ream and run procedure (see this link)
The total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link)
The cuff tear arthropathy arthroplasty (see this link).
The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The smooth and move procedure for irreparable rotator cuff tears (see this link)

Shoulder rehabilitation exercises (see this link). 

Conjoint Tendon Release in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Journal Club on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty - a reflections on the articles. Part 2

Background: Internal rotation limitation is prevalent following modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and negatively affects patients' subjective rating of the procedure. Internal rotation limitation after reverse total shoulder is common (41% of patients can only reach to sacrum level or worse) and negatively affects patient satisfaction. IR limitation is an independent factor associated with lower patient rating after RSA. Most research has been focused on implant geometry (lateralization, glenosphere position/size, NSA, version) with limited success.

Extension of the shoulder is essential for functional internal rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

The Journal Club Article:

Conjoint tendon release results in improvedinternal rotation and pain following reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a combined randomized clinical trial and biomechanical study included a level I RCT (55 patients) plus biomechanical validation (6 cadaveric specimens) study of  Z-plasty release of conjoint tendon 2 cm distal to coracoid.

In the clinical study, the released shoulders showed a modest improvement in reach up the back and lessening in pain, but these differences were not clinically significant (MCID for pain score = 1.5). There was no difference in the ASES score between the groups.

The postoperative internal rotation was greater for shoulders with greater preoperative internal rotation.

In the cadaveric study, the increases in internal rotation and extension were statistically significant but less than 10°. The force to subluxate was decreased by 4.3 N.

Conclusion: While internal rotation deficits are common and problematic after RSA, in this study the improvements in internal rotation after conjoint tendon release were modest and did not provide clinically significant improvement for the patients. 

It has been previously noted that function-specific patient reported outcomes, such as the Simple Shoulder Test, are more sensitive than global PROs in detecting internal rotation deficits after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. It has also been documented that the ability to reach up the back (not a strictly rotational measure) is heavily influenced by the range of shoulder extension.

See:

Functional internal rotation after shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison of anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty

In comparison to anatomic total shoulder, reverse total shoulder is associated with greater anterior shoulder pain and internal rotation dysfunction in patients with osteoarthritis.

Factors influencing functional internal rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Takeaway: conjoint tendon release may be considered when performing RSA if extension is limited

Follow on twitter/X: https://x.com/RickMatsen
Follow on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/shoulder.arthritis
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rick-matsen-88b1a8133/

Here are some videos that are of shoulder interest
Shoulder arthritis - what you need to know (see this link).
How to x-ray the shoulder (see this link).
The ream and run procedure (see this link)
The total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link)
The cuff tear arthropathy arthroplasty (see this link).
The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The smooth and move procedure for irreparable rotator cuff tears (see this link)

Shoulder rehabilitation exercises (see this link).