Spin plays a major role in tennis, basketball, baseball, golf, soccer, cricket, pool, bowling, ping pong, and all other ball sports.
Abstracts are the part of publications most commonly read by surgeons. Spin is most problematic in abstracts, given their brevity and can result in the misrepresentation of a study’s actual findings.
These authors conducted a search in the PubMed and Embase databases using the search terms: “subacromial balloon”, “subacromial spacer”, “rotator cuff”, “irreparable”, “systematic review”, and “meta-analysis.”
A total of 29 studies met their inclusion criteria, of which 10 were reviews or meta-analyses and the remaining 19 were primary studies. The majority of included studies were classified as level IV evidence and only one RCT met this study’s inclusion criteria.
Spin was highly prevalent in the abstracts of primary studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses discussing the use of the subacromial balloon spacer in the treatment of massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears: spin was identified in 27 of the 29 studies ( 93.1%). Below is a list of the types of spin re-ordered by frequency of occurrence in publications on the subacromial balloon.
Spin commonly served to promote the clinical successes of balloon spacer implantation, often by overlooking confounding factors that may question the accuracy of a study’s findings as shown in the two most frequent types:
Evaluation of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of superior capsular reconstruction found least 1 form of spin in all 17 qualifying studies. The most common types of spin were type 5 ("The conclusion claims the beneficial effect of the experimental treatment despite a high risk of bias in primary studies") and type 9 ("Conclusion claims the beneficial effect of the experimental treatment despite reporting bias"), both of which were observed in 11 studies (65%). A statistically significant association between lower level of evidence and type 5 ("The conclusion claims the beneficial effect of the experimental treatment despite a high risk of bias in primary studies") was observed. Interestingly, The Number of Surgeons Using Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Rotator Cuff Repair Is Declining
Readers, reviewers, authors and editors need to be alert to spin in reports of research and consider its presence in efforts to optimize the literature and in the interpretation of current publications, especially those concerning new technologies.
Follow on twitter: https://twitter.com/shoulderarth
Follow on facebook: click on this link
Follow on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/frederick.matsen
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rick-matsen-88b1a8133/
Here are some videos that are of shoulder interest
Shoulder arthritis - what you need to know (see this link).
How to x-ray the shoulder (see this link).
The ream and run procedure (see this link).
The total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The cuff tear arthropathy arthroplasty (see this link).
The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The smooth and move procedure for irreparable rotator cuff tears (see this link).
Shoulder rehabilitation exercises (see this link).
Type 3 spin, “Selective reporting of or overemphasis on efficacy outcomes or analysis favoring the beneficial effect of the experimental intervention”
Type 9 spin, “Conclusion claims the beneficial effect of the experimental treatment despite reporting bias”.
Comment: To date, there is a lack of high-quality evidence demonstrating superiority of the subacromial balloon spacer in treating massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. Subacromial balloon spacer for irreparable rotator cuff tears of the shoulder (START:REACTS): a group-sequential, double-blind, multicentre randomised controlled trial. found that débridement alone outperformed the subacromial balloon spacer for the treatment of these tears.
Similar frequencies of spin are likely to be found in abstracts regarding most other orthopaedic interventions.
Evaluation of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of superior capsular reconstruction found least 1 form of spin in all 17 qualifying studies. The most common types of spin were type 5 ("The conclusion claims the beneficial effect of the experimental treatment despite a high risk of bias in primary studies") and type 9 ("Conclusion claims the beneficial effect of the experimental treatment despite reporting bias"), both of which were observed in 11 studies (65%). A statistically significant association between lower level of evidence and type 5 ("The conclusion claims the beneficial effect of the experimental treatment despite a high risk of bias in primary studies") was observed. Interestingly, The Number of Surgeons Using Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Rotator Cuff Repair Is Declining
Readers, reviewers, authors and editors need to be alert to spin in reports of research and consider its presence in efforts to optimize the literature and in the interpretation of current publications, especially those concerning new technologies.
You can support cutting edge shoulder research that is leading to better care for patients with shoulder problems, click on this link.
Follow on twitter: https://twitter.com/shoulderarth
Follow on facebook: click on this link
Follow on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/frederick.matsen
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rick-matsen-88b1a8133/
Here are some videos that are of shoulder interest
Shoulder arthritis - what you need to know (see this link).
How to x-ray the shoulder (see this link).
The ream and run procedure (see this link).
The total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The cuff tear arthropathy arthroplasty (see this link).
The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The smooth and move procedure for irreparable rotator cuff tears (see this link).
Shoulder rehabilitation exercises (see this link).