Sunday, November 3, 2024

Glenoid erosion in humeral hemiarthroplasty - how to minimize the risk

 Glenoid erosion is a recognized cause of inferior clinical results in humeral hemiarthroplasty.


While there is much current interest in the use of a pyrocarbon joint surface to reduce glenoid erosion, as the x-ray above demonstrates, glenoid erosion can take place with pyrocarbon as well as with metal humeral heads.

Here we present some approaches to reducing the risk of glenoid erosion that apply no matter what type of joint surface is used.

The gleonoid.
In the great majority of arthritic shoulders, there is loss of the congruency between the humeral and glenoid articular surfaces. Thus, rather than having the load distributed evenly across the joint (below left), the load is concentrated on a reduced area at the back of the joint. The resulting pressure (load/area) causes progressive posterior bone loss and decentering.
If a hemiarthroplasty is performed without addressing this force maldistribution, the posterior bone erosion will continue.
On the other hand, if conservative glenoid reaming is used to create a single concavity, even load distribution can be achieved. 


Experience suggests that a 2 mm diametral mismatch between the humeral head and the reamed glenoid is optimal.


If glenoid erosion is to be minimized, the maximum amount of the best quality bone (arrows) needs to be preserved.


by conservative reaming



This can be accomplished by accepting, rather than correcting, glenoid retroversion.


The diagrams below show the preservation of quality bone with accepting the glenoid retroversion (left) in comparison to the greater amount of bone removed with correcting glenoid retroversion (right)





In reaming the glenoid, sharp reamers and irrigation can help minimize the risk of thermal injury to the glenoid bone (see 
Thermal effects of glenoid reaming during shoulder arthroplasty in vivo).


While some surgeons advocate drilling holes in the reamed glenoid surface

it is apparent that this can weaken the glenoid surface making it more prone to erosion. Perhaps this "docking" is more appropriate when making a pie.


Finally, when possible it is desirable to preserve the glenoid labrum recognizing its load bearing and stabilization functions.





Overstuffing: Soft tissues

As pointed out in How to Overstuff an Anatomic Arthroplasty and Overstuffing is not a radiographic diagnosis, overstuffing is a condition in which the size and position of the shoulder arthroplasty implants result in excess tightening of the soft tissues encapsulating the joint. Thus, a shoulder with a chronically tight capsule and rotator cuff may be overstuffed by normally sized implant.


As pointed out in Practical Evaluation and Management of the Shoulder, overstuffing can not only restrict the range of glenohumeral motion



but it can also increase the force necessary to move the joint,
   

which increases pressure on the glenoid joint surface when vigorous stretching is carried out.


Thus for that reason, soft tissue releases are important for reducing the pressure on the glenoid and the risk of glenoid erosion. 

180 degree releases if there is excessive posterior translation

360 releases if the shoulder is tight all around


The adequacy of the releases can be verified while the trial components are in place, verifying that the shoulder can be easily flexed to at least 150 degrees




and that the shoulder meets the 40, 50, 60 rules (40 degrees of external rotation with the subscapularis approximated, 50% posterior translation, and 60 degrees of internal rotation with the arm abducted).


Overstuffing: Implant size and positioning.

While much attention is being paid to pyrocarbon as an alternative bearing surface, glenoid erosion can be seen with humeral heads of any type of material.

Common implant related causes of overstuffing
.

(1) Inadequate head cut, leaving a too long neck.



(2) Too large humeral component




(3) Head too medial





(4) Head too high







When the head is high, it acts like a cam (click here), excessively tightening the inferior capsule when the arm is elevated because the center of rotation is malpositioned. This tightening results in increased pressure on the glenoid surface when the arm is raised.






(5)  Head high and medial



From the above it is noted that humeral head malposition can occur with pyrocarbon and with metal heads; humeral head malposition can occur with stemless, short stem and standard length stems.

To avoid overstuffing related to the humeral component, careful attention needs to be paid to the neck cut, head size and component position.


Conclusion
The risk of glenoid erosion can be reduced by preserving and protecting the best bone in the glenoid, balancing the soft tissues to optimize glenoid laxity, along with careful selection and positioning of the humeral component.

Avoiding glenoid erosion appears to depend more on surgical technique than on technology.

You can support cutting edge shoulder research that is leading to better care for patients with shoulder problems, click on this link

Please join us for the AAOS Infection course!!!



Follow on twitter/X: https://x.com/RickMatsen
Follow on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/shoulder.arthritis
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rick-matsen-88b1a8133/

Here are some videos that are of shoulder interest
Shoulder arthritis - what you need to know (see this link).
How to x-ray the shoulder (see this link).
The ream and run procedure (see this link).
The total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The cuff tear arthropathy arthroplasty (see this link).
The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The smooth and move procedure for irreparable rotator cuff tears (see this link).
Shoulder rehabilitation exercises (see this link).