Showing posts with label double row. Show all posts
Showing posts with label double row. Show all posts

Sunday, May 31, 2020

Cuff repair: is single row or double row repair better?

A Majority of Single Versus Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair Comparisons Fail to Consider Modern Single-Row Techniques A Systematic Review

These authors sought to analyze the literature comparing single row (SR) and double-row (DR) rotator cuff repairs with particular attention to the specific technique types that were compared.

Primary studies from 8 high-quality metaanalyses published prior to 2014, and any Level-III or higher studies published from 2014 to 2019, were included.

Manuscripts were classified on the basis of the specific type of simple or complex SR or DR repair performed.

Of the 22 studies, only 3 (14%) of the studies compared a biomechanically superior complex SR technique and a DR repair.The remaining 19 (86%) of the studies utilized biomechanically inferior, simple SR techniques in their comparisons.


Among the articles in which simple SR repair was compared with classic DR, all 12 studies assessed clinical outcomes. Nine (75%) of the 12 found no clinical difference between these repair techniques. 

Six studies compared simple SR and transosseous-equivalent DR and presented conclusions regarding clinical outcomes. Five (83%) of the 6 found no clinical difference between the techniques. 

Of the studies comparing simple SR with any type of DR, 14 (78%) of 18 studies concluded there was no difference in clinical results.

Three studies compared more complex SR techniques with transosseous equivalent DR; essentially no significant differences in clinical outcomes were reported between the techniques

Comment: This article reinforces the view that in spite of a massive literature on cuff repair techniques, it is unclear that the clinical outcomes are improving. Readers may be interested in the article Published Evidence on Factors Associated With Repair Integrity and Clinical Outcome 

In this report, 108 of these articles, reporting on over 8011 shoulders, met the inclusion criteria of reporting quantitative data on both imaging and clinical outcomes after rotator cuff repair.

The article found that while the number of relevant articles published per year increased dramatically over the period of the study, the clinical and anatomic results did not show improvement over this period. The weighted mean retear rate was 26.6% at a mean of 23.7 months after surgery. Retears were associated with more fatty infiltration, larger tear size, advanced age, and double-row repairs.

Clinical improvement averaged 72% of the maximum possible improvement. Patient-reported outcomes were generally improved whether or not the repair restored the integrity of the rotator cuff.

The authors concluded that in spite of a dramatic increase in the number of publications per year, there is little evidence that the results of rotator cuff repair are improving. The information needed to guide the management of this commonly treated and costly condition is seriously deficient.

Interestingly, while the number of articles written about cuff repair has risen exponentially, the outcomes in terms of cuff integrity, clinical scores and percent of possible improvement have not improved over the last several decades.
=====
How you can support research in shoulder surgery Click on this link.

To see our new series of youtube videos on important shoulder surgeries and how they are done, click here.

Use the "Search" box to the right to find other topics of interest to you.

You may be interested in some of our most visited web pages  arthritis, total shoulder, ream and run, reverse total shoulder, CTA arthroplasty, and rotator cuff surgery as well as the 'ream and run essentials'

Thursday, May 31, 2018

Does the technique of rotator cuff repair matter?

Clinical outcomes and repair integrity after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair: suture-bridge versus double-row modified Mason-Allen technique

These authors compared the clinical and radiologic outcomes of patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs by the suture-bridge and double-row modified Mason-Allen techniques.
76 consecutive cases of full-thickness rotator cuff tear, 1 to 4 cm in the sagittal plane, for which arthroscopic rotator cuff repair was performed, were included. The suture-bridge technique was used in 37 consecutive shoulders; and the double-row modified Mason- Allen technique, in 39 consecutive shoulders. 

Clinical outcomes at a minimum of 2 years (mean, 35.7 months) were not different between the two groups. Postoperative cuff integrity at a mean of 17.7 months by magnetic resonance imaging showed a retear rate of 18.9% in the shoulders having suture-bridge repair and 12.8% in those having double-row modified Mason-Allen repair.

Comment: Unfortunately, this paper does not present the clinical outcomes of the failed repairs, which, in other studies have been shown to be comparable to those of intact repairs.

In their discussion the authors reference papers showing rehear rates approaching 60% in some settings. Thus the clinical significance of a retear needs careful investigation.

=====
Use the "Search" box to the right to find other topics of interest to you.


You may be interested in some of our most visited web pages including:shoulder arthritis, total shoulder, ream and run, reverse total shoulder, CTA arthroplasty, and rotator cuff surgery as well as the 'ream and run essentials'

Monday, January 13, 2014

Single row, double row, outcomes, and high retear rates.


Meta-analysis comparing single-row and double-row repair techniques in the arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff tears

These authors conducted a meta-analysis of recently published studies to compare the clinical results of a double-row technique with the results of a single-row technique.

Neither the Constant score nor the UCLA score showed a significant difference in the outcome. The ASES score did show significantly better outcomes with the double row repair. 

The retear rates were high, 83 out of 258 of the repairs were retorn: 23.8% in the double-row repair group and 40.2% in the single-row repair group, indicating that almost 1/3 of the surgeries failed to achieve the objective of a cuff repair: cuff integrity.

The authors did not examine the effect of repair integrity on the clinical outcome.



Friday, November 8, 2013

single row vs. double row rotator cuff repairs - a meta-analysis

Meta-analysis comparing single-row and double-row repair techniques in the arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff tears

The authors identified 9 randomized or quasi-randomized clinical trials that reported the outcome of single-row repair and double-row repair techniques. 5 of these were randomized prospective studies. Importantly, nonrandomized comparative clinical studies (level III evidence), reviews, case series, expert opinions, and editorial pieces (level IV and V studies) were excluded. Studies that reported only nonclinical outcome measures or were in vitro and animal studies were also excluded.

They found a statistically significant difference in favor of double-row repair for the overall ASES score, re-tear rate, and internal rotation range of motion. In shoulders with a tear  > 30 mm in the anteroposterior dimension, double-row techniques produced better outcomes than single-row techniques.  However, there were no statistically significant differences in the overall Constant score, UCLA score, external rotation and forward elevation range of motion, or muscle strength. 

Unfortunately, only 5 studies reported retear rates. The rate of failure to achieve anatomic integrity at followup was high: 30 of 126 (23.8%) of the double-row repairs had retears while  53 of 132 (40.2%) of the single-row repairs had retears.  The authors did not report the relationship of retear to clinical outcome.

===
To see the topics covered in this Blog, click here

Use the "Search" box to the right to find other topics of interest to you.

You may be interested in some of our most visited web pages including:shoulder arthritis, total shoulder, ream and run, reverse total shoulder, CTA arthroplasty, rotator cuff surgery, 'ream and run essentials' and consultation for shoulder arthritis.