Showing posts with label reverse total shoulder complications. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reverse total shoulder complications. Show all posts

Friday, May 30, 2025

How can we prevent acromial and spine fractures after reverse total shoulder?

As emphasized in a recent post, acromial and scapular spine fractures continue to be a major cause of poor results after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

A couple of examples to kick things off.

Case 1: A 78 year old man had recognized risk factors for these fractures: osteoporosis and the diagnosis of cuff tear arthropathy. He has been treated for his osteoporosis with Alendronate.

His preoperative and post reverse total shoulder radiographs are shown below.


.


A month after surgery, while his arm was still in a sling immobilizer, he developed pain in his lateral shoulder. Examination revealed a localized spot of exquisite tenderness on the lateral acromion. On an axillary view a non-displaced crack is seen in his acromion at the site of his tenderness.



Case 2: An 82 year old woman had symptomatic cuff tear arthropathy and this AP radiograph


A reverse total shoulder was performed as shown below


Two months after an uneventful recovery, she developed pain on use of the arm and point tenderness over the acromion posteriorly. While plain x-rays were unremarkable, a CT scan documented her stress fracture at the point of her tenderness


While these patients' age, sex, diagnoses of cuff tear arthropathy and osteoporosis were not modifiable, the question is whether there are modifiable risk factors, such as the geometry of the prosthetic RSA reconstruction.

A review of much of the current literature on this topic can be found in this post.

A recent publication, Shoulder Geometry After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty with a Medialized Glenoid and a Lateralized Humerus Predicts Subacromial Notching and Acromial or Scapular Spine Fractures, attempted to assess (1) whether the difference between the acromion to glenosphere center of rotation distance (DA) and the greater tuberosity to glenosphere center distance (DGT) influences the incidence of subacromial notching (SaN) in shoulders following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) and (2) whether this relationship is associated with the incidence of acromion or scapular spine fractures.



They  conducted a retrospective cohort study of 526 patients who underwent RSA with a medialized glenoid and a lateralized humerus.

After propensity score matching, 360 shoulders were analyzed (240 in the DA ≥ DGT group and 120 in the DA < DGT group). Both groups showed similar improvements in clinical outcomes postoperatively.

The DA ≥ DGT group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of SaN (0%) compared to the DA < DGT group (10.8%, P < 0.001). Additionally, the DA ≥ DGT group had a lower rate of acromion or scapular spine fractures (0.4%) compared to the DA < DGT group (5.0%, P = 0.006) [although a larger sample size will be necessary to achieve statistical power]. 

If we go back to Case 1, the 78 year old man with the acromial fracture, his distance to acromion (green arrow) was ≥ distance to greater tuberosity (yellow arrow).



  1. If we revisit Case 2, the 82 year old lady, her distance to acromion (green arrow) was ≥ the distance to greater tuberosity (yellow arrow).


These cases remind us that age, diagnosis of cuff tear arthropathy and osteoporosis are more strongly associated with the occurrence of acromion/spine fractures than component design or position. That said, patient demographics (female sex, age, rheumatoid arthritis) and shoulder diagnosis (cuff tear arthropathy, massive irreparable cuff tears with pseudoparalysis) are not modifiable, so we need to continue to research modifiable factors that may reduce the rate of these factors especially in high risk patients. 

Possible candidates to be studied are (1) assuring that osteoporosis is under optimal management, (2) minimizing global lateralization of the humerus in RSA, (3) defining the optimal degree of glenosphere tilt and inferior placement, (4) burring down the lateral aspect of the greater tuberosity to make sure that there is no tuberosity/acromial contact when the arm is abducted and rotated, (5) slowing the return to activity after surgery, (6) prophylactic calcitonin, (7) considering a cuff tear arthropathy prosthesis rather than a RSA in high risk patients.

Jon Levy kindly responded to this post stating that his big three for minimizing the acromial / spine fracture risk are 

(1) optimizing glenoid component fixation

(2) avoiding early arc abduction impingement (he currently uses 70 degrees as his goal post).

(3) avoiding lateralizing the final humerus position more than the preop position.

We need to continue explore better methods for preventing these fractures: they are disabling for the patients that sustain them; they are too common. 




Common Yellowthroat
Montlake Fill, April 2020

You can support cutting edge shoulder research that is leading to better care for patients with shoulder problems, click on this link

Follow on twitter/X: https://x.com/RickMatsen
Follow on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/shoulder.arthritis
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rick-matsen-88b1a8133/

Here are some videos that are of shoulder interest
Shoulder arthritis - what you need to know (see this link).
How to x-ray the shoulder (see this link).
The ream and run procedure (see this link).
The total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The cuff tear arthropathy arthroplasty (see this link).
The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The smooth and move procedure for irreparable rotator cuff tears (see this link)
Shoulder rehabilitation exercises (see this link).


Sunday, November 12, 2023

The reverse total shoulder - some news

Here are some recent topics and articles of interest regarding the reverse total shoulder.

*The fixation of single piece (non-modular, monobloc) reverse total shoulder humeral components is more stable than that of modular components when the proximal humeral bone is deficient.

The authors of Torsional stability of modular and non-modular reverse shoulder humeral components in a proximal humeral bone loss model tested the torsional stability of three reverse humeral stem designs (two modular and one monobloc) in Sawbones humeri prepared to simulate intact and proximal humeral bone loss. All fixation failures, whether in intact or bone loss humeri, were in modular implants. In the bone loss model, all of the modular humeral components failed at the connection between the humeral socket and the humeral stem. None of the single piece (non-modular, monobloc) (shown below) humeral components failed in either the intact or bone loss humeri.


In cases of proximal bone deficiency, the addition of allograft may add to stability; however, as shown in the case below, the humeral socket-stem junction of a modular humeral component is still at risk for failure.





*Who gets acromial/spine fractures and in what part of the scapula do they occur?


From Predictive factors of acromial fractures following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a subgroup analysis of 860 shoulders, from Acromion Fractures after Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Occur in Predictable Clusters and from Predictors of acromial and scapular stress fracture after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a study by the ASES Complications of RSA Multicenter Research Group we see that the great majority (80%) of the patients with  acromial fractures complicating reverse total shoulder had their RSA performed for rotator cuff deficiency. This observation suggests that the deltoid origin on the acromion/scapular spine is at increased risk of fatigue fracture following RSA if the stabilizing and supporting function of the rotator cuff is absent.


CT analysis showed the fracture locations were evenly distributed among four locations on the scapula (Acromion Fractures after Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Occur in Predictable Clusters)




Outcomes of conservative treatment of acromial and scapular spine stress fracture post reverse shoulder arthroplasty – a systematic review with meta-analysis noted that non-operative treatment of Type 3 fractures tended to have worse clinical outcomes than non-operative treatment for the other types of fractures.


*Does constraint offer stability?

Since instability is an important risk after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, one might think that a deeper humeral socket (i.e. a "constrained" liner) would improve the stability of the articulation. 




However, the range of glenohumeral motion after a reverse total shoulder relies on freedom from unwanted contact (impingement) between the humeral and scapular elements. In contrast to the hip, which is stabilized by a deep socket, the reverse glenohumeral joint has a shallow socket and is stabilized by concavity compression; see Understanding the dislocating reverse total shoulder: concavity compression. Impingement can not only restrict the range of motion, but can also cause instability as the articular surfaces are levered apart when the humeral cup contacts the scapula.


The authors of Impact of constrained humeral liner on impingement-free range of motion and impingement type in reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a computer simulation aimed to determine the influence of humeral liner constraint (depth) on impingement-free ROM utilizing a computer simulation model. They found that impingement-free ROM was reduced during abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation with the combination of a standard glenosphere and constrained humeral liner. Abduction was limited by contact between the constrained liner and the superior glenoid neck (see figure below). This effect was less with a lateralized glenosphere.



Retentive (constrained) liners can also risk unwanted liner-glenoid contact inferiorly, posteriorly and anteriorly.


*Are we asking the right question?


The authors of Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: significantly different characteristics and outcomes in shoulders with intact versus torn rotator cuff found that at 2 years following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, Constant scores were significantly better for primary osteoarthritis (OA) with intact rotator cuff, compared to either primary OA with rotator cuff tears or cuff tear arthropathy (OA secondary to cuff tears). 


Notably, one in ten patients having OA with intact rotator cuff experienced a complication (intraoperative humeral fracture, intraoperative glenoid fracture, glenoid loosening, perioperative fracture, neurologic injury). 


The point is that we can't change a patient's diagnosis, so this study is unlikely to change treatment. The question that needs to be answered is, "in matched patients with primary osteoarthritis and an intact rotator cuff, how do the results compare between anatomic and reverse total shoulders?" How likely is it that an anatomic total shoulder is complicated by humeral fracture, glenoid fracture, neurologic injury, acromial fracture, or dislocation?


You can support cutting edge shoulder research and education that are leading to better care for patients with shoulder problems, click on this link.

Follow on twitter: https://twitter.com/RickMatsen or https://twitter.com/shoulderarth
Follow on facebook: click on this link
Follow on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/frederick.matsen
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rick-matsen-88b1a8133/

Here are some videos that are of shoulder interest
Shoulder arthritis - what you need to know (see this link).
How to x-ray the shoulder (see this link).
The ream and run procedure (see this link).
The total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The cuff tear arthropathy arthroplasty (see this link).
The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The smooth and move procedure for irreparable rotator cuff tears (see this link).
Shoulder rehabilitation exercises (see this link).



Monday, June 19, 2023

Reverse total shoulder outcomes in female patients, are they worse than for male patients? Fractures in 26%

A recent post, What is the outcome of shoulder joint replacement arthroplasty? - need to consider all three dimensions  emphasized the importance of understanding the three different dimensions of measuring the outcome of shoulder arthroplasty: the final scores for comfort and function, the improvement in the comfort and function scores, and the patient satisfaction. In that post, it was pointed out that these three dimensions often yielded different impressions of the surgical outcome.

This point is demonstrated by a recent series of 693 patients receiving an Anatomical Shoulder Inverse/Reverse prosthesis (Zimmer-Biomet).



The authors of Why is female gender associated with poorer clinical outcome after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty? reported the absolute Constant scores (aCS), relative Constant scores (rCS) and Subjective Shoulder Values (SSV) for 422 female patients and 271 male patients. The results are shown below:

final score for comfort and function scores (better in males)
females: aCS  63.5, rCS 77.7, SSV 78.4%
males:    aCS  67.6, rCS 81.4, SSV 79.1%

the improvement in the comfort and function scores (better in females)
females: ΔaCS 31.9, ΔrCS 38.3, ΔSSV 47.8%
males:    ΔaCS 29.6, ΔrCS 33.8, ΔSSV 46.8% 

patient satisfaction (no difference between males and females)
"the subjective satisfaction after RTSA is on average the same in men and women. The two groups also do not differ significantly in terms of postoperative pain and limitations in terms of activities of daily living"

Yet another dimension was revealed by the observation that one out of four (111 out of 422) female patients sustained an intraoperative or postoperative fracture, where as the fracture rate was half that for males.





Comment: The results of this study exemplify the three dimensions of outcome assessment. Women were equally satisfied after RTSA, they improved by a greater amount than males, but had lower final scores. 

The high fracture rate in this study is a concern. The report does not clarify if the fracture rate is related to implant design, implant size, surgical technique or to patient characteristics, such as bone mineral density.

You can support cutting edge shoulder research that is leading to better care for patients with shoulder problems, click on this link.

Follow on twitter: https://twitter.com/shoulderarth
Follow on facebook: click on this link
Follow on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/frederick.matsen
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rick-matsen-88b1a8133/

Here are some videos that are of shoulder interest
Shoulder arthritis - what you need to know (see this link).
How to x-ray the shoulder (see this link).
The ream and run procedure (see this link).
The total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The cuff tear arthropathy arthroplasty (see this link).
The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The smooth and move procedure for irreparable rotator cuff tears (see this link).
Shoulder rehabilitation exercises (see this link).


Thursday, April 20, 2023

Reverse total shoulder or anatomic total shoulder for osteoarthritis?



A recent article from the Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Total shoulder replacement stems in osteoarthritis—short, long, or reverse? An analysis of the impact of crosslinked polyethylene, presented data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry on the long-term survivorship for patients with osteoarthritis having reverse total shoulders (RTSA) performed for osteoarthritis in comparison to those having anatomic total shoulders (TSA) with modern polyethylene for the same diagnosis.

In this population-based registry, RTSA had significantly higher short and long term revision rates than TSA with cross linked polyethylene.













The incidences over time for the different indications for revision of RTSA are shown below





The incidences over time for the different indications for revisions of TSA with cross linked polyethylene are shown below





A recent short term (one-year) followup study in the JAAOS compared the demographics, surgical complications, and revision procedures between RTSA and TSA: Surgical Complications After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in the United States.


The one year revision rates were higher for RTSA in both the AOA/JSES and the JAAOS studies.



In the JAAOS studhy, patients younger than 50 years had higher one year rates of surgical complications. Male patients had higher RTSA complication rates, whereas female patients had higher TSA complication rates. History of tobacco use, depression, and obesity were risk factors for higher complication rates.


As shown below, the one year rates of infection/drainage, dislocation and fracture were higher for RTSA while the rate of rotator cuff tear was higher for TSA.




From these data it can be seen that the rate of rotator cuff tears after TSA was higher than the rate of revision for TSA, suggesting that patients with cuff tears after TSA may have had sufficiently preserved function and tolerated the cuff defect so they did not want to have a revision to a RSA.


Comment: In spite of the widespread use of RTSA for patients with osteoarthritis and an intact cuff, these two studies do not provide data showing that RTSA has better outcomes than TSA. Further well-controlled population-based studies that include data on patient comfort and function will be necessary to illuminate the value of the two procedures.

You can support cutting edge shoulder research that is leading to better care for patients with shoulder problems, click on this link.

Follow on twitter: https://twitter.com/shoulderarth
Follow on facebook: click on this link
Follow on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/frederick.matsen
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rick-matsen-88b1a8133/

Here are some videos that are of shoulder interest
Shoulder arthritis - what you need to know (see this link).
How to x-ray the shoulder (see this link).
The ream and run procedure (see this link).
The total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The cuff tear arthropathy arthroplasty (see this link).
The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The smooth and move procedure for irreparable rotator cuff tears (see this link).
Shoulder rehabilitation exercises (see this link).



Thursday, September 29, 2022

Short stemmed reverse total shoulder arthroplasty - a 32% complication rate

Mid- to long-term clinical outcomes after press-fit short stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty

These authors reviewed the records of 60 patients that received a reverse total shoulder (RSA) using a press-fit uncemented shortened humeral stem (Humeris® Reversible, FX Solutions, Viriat, France)




9 (15%) died of causes unrelated to RSA and 4 (7%) were lost to follow-up. 


Within the remaining 47 the following 15 shoulder complications were listed:

3 acromial fractures

1 acromion, humerus and scapula fracture

1 clavicle fracture

3 infections

5 instability/dislocations

1 axillary nerve injury

1 shoulder pain


Comment: While it is unclear what factors led to this high complication rate, these data do not create a compelling case for this particular prosthesis.


A recent post How should the humeral component be secured in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty? presents a comparison of the outcomes of short versus standard length stems.


Our technique for RSA is shown in this link.

To add this blog to your reading list in Google Chrome, click on the reading list icon



You can support cutting edge shoulder research that is leading to better care for patients with shoulder problems, click on this link.


Follow on twitter: https://twitter.com/shoulderarth

Follow on facebook: click on this link

Follow on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/frederick.matsen

Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rick-matsen-88b1a8133/

Here are some videos that are of shoulder interest
Shoulder arthritis - what you need to know (see this link).
How to x-ray the shoulder (see this link).
The ream and run procedure (see this link).
The total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The cuff tear arthropathy arthroplasty (see this link).
The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The smooth and move procedure for irreparable rotator cuff tears (see this link).
Shoulder rehabilitation exercises (see this link).

Saturday, September 17, 2022

Acromion and spine fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty - what little do we know?


The authors of Clinical results of conservative versus operative treatment of acromial and scapular spine fractures following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty reviewed their experience with operative and non-operative treatment of patients with acromial or scapular spine fractures after reverse total shoulders (RTSA). These fractures were recognized 30 of 1146 RTSAs, although there was no prospective study of these patients to determine the actual prevalence of this complication. 23 had acromial fractures, and 7 had a scapular spine fracture.

While the indications for internal fixation were not described, 7 had surgery and 23 did not. 

The authors could not relate the healing rate to the type of fracture or type of treatment. Neither method of treatment yielded better outcomes and neither successfully restored shoulder comfort and function to the levels achieved by patients without these fractures. 


These poor outcomes from a major medical center prompted a literature review to see what we know about this disabling complication. In the presentation below, supporting references can be accessed by clicking on the pub med links. 

I. Overview

These fractures occur after about 4% of RTSAs, often within the first year. Many - sometimes conflicting - risk factors for these have been suggested, including advanced age, female sex, osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis, rotator cuff tear arthropathy, revision arthroplasty, falls, prior surgery, thin acromion, high glenoid inclination, medialized preoperative center of rotation, use of a long superiorly placed screw during baseplate fixation, increased deltoid length > 1 inch, contact of the acromion with the greater tuberosity, disruption of the scapular ring by transection of the coracoacromial ligament, lower distalization of the humerus, medialization of the center of rotation, and use of a lateralized glenoid.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32506260


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32807375


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32995915


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34659470


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33185725


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33038496


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34488294


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31629651


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31693743


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33027125


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31154841


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27583005


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33677115/


II. Non operative treatment

    A. Fractures that occur at or medial to the glenoid face demonstrate high rates of unsatisfactory results and worse clinical outcomes with nonoperative management.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35066119

    B. Immobilization with an abduction splint frequently resulted in nonunion or malunion


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30241984



    C. Nonoperative management was chosen due to a concern that stable fixation would not be obtained with surgery.


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20506958


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35066119



III. Operative treatment


    A. Most of the studies comparing surgical methods were carried out in in vitro using models that do not replicate the osteoporotic bone commonly encountered clinically.




        1. Double plating better in comparison of fixation methods in synthetic scapulae


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35683515


        2. Dorsal plate with lateral hook performed better in cadaver study of fixation methods


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32788041


        3. Locking compression plate was the best of three plating techniques in sawbones


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29996981


    B. Most clinical reports of surgical treatment consist of case reports with only a few patients


        1. Single case using locked double plating of scapular spine fracture


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32913063


        2. Single case using plate and screws


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33330203


        3. 7 type II fractures and 4 type III were treated surgically 


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21448773

 

        4. Plate and screws used in three cases


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29222664


        5. Plate in a single case of bilateral fractures


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33511198


        6. 4 fractures with 50% union rate after internal fixation 


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25818527


        7. Single case of internal fixation


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24403763


    C. Clinical comparison of operative and non-operative treatment


        1. Open reduction-internal fixation was not shown to be clinically superior


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30497925


        2. Operative treatment was not superior to conservative treatment


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35447315

 

        3. 3 surgical and 3 nonoperative – clinically unsatisfactory results

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21493106

 

        4. The healing rate was shown to be much higher with a surgical approach. Nevertheless, fracture consolidation did not result in better clinical outcomes compared with nonunion.


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34968697


 

Comment: Acromial and scapular spine fractures complicating reverse total shoulder are not uncommon (occurring in 1 out of 25 cases), and usually lead to major loss in shoulder comfort and function. Currently we do not know either how to prevent or how to treat these fractures.


To add this blog to your reading list in Google Chrome, click on the reading list icon



You can support cutting edge shoulder research that is leading to better care for patients with shoulder problems, click on this link.


Follow on twitter: https://twitter.com/shoulderarth

Follow on facebook: click on this link

Follow on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/frederick.matsen

Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rick-matsen-88b1a8133/

Here are some videos that are of shoulder interest
Shoulder arthritis - what you need to know (see this link).
How to x-ray the shoulder (see this link).
The ream and run procedure (see this link).
The total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The cuff tear arthropathy arthroplasty (see this link).
The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The smooth and move procedure for irreparable rotator cuff tears (see this link).

Shoulder rehabilitation exercises (see this link).