These authors note "there has been a trend away from standard length cemented humeral implants to press-fit stems, and recently to shorter stem implants, " but minimal literature to support this trend.
The goal of their study was to compare clinical outcomes and implant migration between cemented standard length humeral stems and press-fit short stems using radio-stereometric analysis in 41 shoulders randomized to receive each of the two stems.
Following surgery, the shoulders were imaged sequentially with stereo x-rays.
At six months, one year, and two years postoperatively, press-fit short stems migrated significantly more than cemented stems along the superior-inferior translation axis.
They noted stress shielding at the proximal medial calcar (solid arrow), and increased sclerosis at the medial metaphyseal diaphyseal junction (dashed arrow) with the use of press-fit stems (below).
The authors did not detect a significant difference in the clinical outcomes between the two types of stem fixation.
Comment: The are many different designs of reverse humeral stems with different approaches to lateralization and fixation.
Our favored approach is shown in this link. It enables secure prothesis alignment in the proximal humerus so that subsidence is minimized
Follow on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/frederick.matsen
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rick-matsen-88b1a8133/
How you can support research in shoulder surgery Click on this link.
Here are some videos that are of shoulder interest