Saturday, July 23, 2022

Reverse total shoulder - the instability problem

In Analysis of 4063 complications of shoulder arthroplasty reported to the US Food and Drug Administration from 2012 to 2016 the authors analyzed the arthroplasty the failure reports mandated by the US Food and Drug Administration for all hospitals.  For the 2390 reverse arthroplasties, the most common failure modes was dislocation/instability (32%), followed by infection (13.8%), glenosphere-baseplate dissociation (12.2%), failed/loosened baseplate (10.4%), humeral component dissociation/tray fracture (5.5%), difficulty inserting the baseplate (4.8%), and difficulty inserting the glenosphere (4.2%). 




In Complications in reverse shoulder arthroplasty the authors point out that the reported overall complication rate of primary RSA was approximately 15%; when RSA is used in the revision setting, the complication rate may approach 40%. The most common complication of RSA was instability, followed by infection, notching, loosening, nerve injury, acromial and scapular spine fractures, intra-operative fractures and component disengagement.


In Outcomes of instability after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: reoperation and persistent instability are common the
 authors evaluated the outcomes of 50 patients having instability after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). 40 (80%) required revision surgery while 10 (20%) were treated successfully with closed reduction. There were no significant differences between the revision and closed reduction groups with respect to age, sex, BMI, diagnosis, or nature or number of dislocations.
Patients requiring revision were more likely to have had surgery prior to the reverse total shoulder and had longer average times from the reverse total shoulder to dislocation than those managed by closed reduction (7.6 vs 2.2 months).
Following revision surgery, 17 patients (42.5%) reported recurrent instability, and 14 (35.0%) required additional revision surgery. Of the 14 patients who required additional procedures, 4 continued to have instability (28.6%) and 5 required even further surgery (35.7%). Ultimately, stability was never achieved in 7 of 50 patients (14%) after their index instability event. Patients who required >1 revision operation were more likely to have infections and to have undergone the index RSA as a revision procedure
Five patients had positive culture findings at the time of revision surgery, and 4 were considered to have probable or definitive infections.

Comment: Taken together, these papers point to the magnitude and difficulty presented by instability after a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Thus in performing a reverse total shoulder it is important to properly select and position the components, to check for unwanted contact between the humerus/humeral component and the scapula, and to vigorously examine the completed arthroplasty for instability, especially with the arm in adduction, extension and internal rotation.


See also Reverse total shoulder - dislocations and how to avoid them and Acromiohumeral cerclage in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for recurrent instability




You can support cutting edge shoulder research that is leading to better care for patients with shoulder problems, click on this link.


Follow on twitter: https://twitter.com/shoulderarth

Follow on facebook: click on this link

Follow on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/frederick.matsen

Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rick-matsen-88b1a8133/

Here are some videos that are of shoulder interest
Shoulder arthritis - what you need to know (see this link).
How to x-ray the shoulder (see this link).
The ream and run procedure (see this link).
The total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The cuff tear arthropathy arthroplasty (see this link).
The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The smooth and move procedure for irreparable rotator cuff tears (see this link).
Shoulder rehabilitation exercises (see this link).