Sunday, October 28, 2018

Total shoulder arthroplasty - what matters?

Radiographic comparison of finned, cementless central pegged glenoid component and conventional cemented pegged glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study

These authors prospectively compare radiographic lucency between a finned, cementless central pegged glenoid component


and a conventional cemented pegged glenoid component 


on immediate postoperative and minimum 2-year follow-up radiographs.

Fifty-four patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty were prospectively randomized to receive one of the two glenoid components. 

Patients who had undergone revision surgery or had died before evaluation were excluded. 

Fifty patients met inclusion criteria; 42 were available for followup with the original glenoid implant in place. The mean follow-up duration was 35 months (24-64 months).

At a mean of 35 months after surgery, there were no significant differences in glenoid radiolucency between the two components.  

Comment:  This is an important randomized control trial with short term radiographic followup without clinical outcome data.

It is recognized that glenoid component failure is often delayed, usually appearing 10 years after surgery. A recent study of 333 patients, Results of a convex-back cemented keeled glenoid component in primary osteoarthritis: multicenter study with a follow-up greater than 5 years, found radiologic loosening of 0.3% at 5 years and 48.5% at 10 years.

It is hoped that these authors will be able to follow this cohort for another eight years to assess the radiographic and clinical status of the shoulders. To that point it is of interest that some of the shoulders in this series showed early glenoid loosening

while others showed superior displacement of the humeral component relative to the glenoid - a situation known to risk subsequent rocking horse loosening of the glenoid component.


It is of interest that the great majority of these cases were done for glenoid type A pathology:
79% type A 21% type B
This distribution of pathoanatomy is different from that in most reports. For example in the above referenced study of 333 shoulders, there were
54% type A, 42% type B, 4% other

In type A pathoanatomy, shown below, the humerus is centered in the glenoid.
 Many believe that type B glenoids (shown below) are at higher risk for glenoid component failure. 

It seems likely that these authors treated many of their type B glenoids with another type of arthroplasty.

Seven complications (13%) occurred in the 54 patients initially enrolled in the study:
one intraoperative proximal humerus metaphyseal fracture
one postoperative traumatic rupture of the subscapularis tendon
one intraoperative nondisplaced greater tuberosity fracture 
two glenohumeral dislocations (1 anterior and 1 posterior) 
one postoperative infection 
one small anterior glenoid fracture that occurred during glenoid reaming


=====
We have a new set of shoulder youtubes about the shoulder, check them out at this link.

Be sure to visit "Ream and Run - the state of the art"  regarding this radically conservative approach to shoulder arthritis at this link and this link

Use the "Search" box to the right to find other topics of interest to you.


You may be interested in some of our most visited web pages   arthritis, total shoulder, ream and runreverse total shoulderCTA arthroplasty, and rotator cuff surgery as well as the 'ream and run essentials'