Showing posts with label physical therapy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label physical therapy. Show all posts

Saturday, June 10, 2023

How long is physical therapy after shoulder joint replacement?

  ChatGPT is a interactive language model developed by OpenAI, that uses a deep learning framework to understand queries and to generate coherent, contextually relevant responses based on a set of books, websites, and texts selected by researchers at OpenAI. While search engines such as Google provide links to websites that may or may not be accurate or relevant, ChatGPT provides a readable synthesis of the information from its comprehensive sources,

We sought ChatGPT responses to questions frequently posed by patients with shoulder arthritis.  These responses cannot used as specific medical advice. Patients should consult medical professionals for the most current and accurate information on their shoulder condition.


We asked "How long is physical therapy after shoulder joint replacement?"

ChatGPT replied: 

"
The duration of physical therapy after shoulder joint replacement can vary depending on several factors, including the specific surgical procedure, the individual's overall health, the extent of the preoperative condition, and the progress made during rehabilitation. Typically, physical therapy for shoulder joint replacement can range from several weeks to several months.

In the initial phase, which usually lasts a few weeks, the focus of physical therapy is on pain management, wound healing, and restoring range of motion. During this time, passive range-of-motion exercises, gentle stretching, and techniques to reduce swelling and pain may be employed. The therapist will also guide you in the proper use of any assistive devices, such as slings or braces.

As healing progresses, the therapy will gradually transition to more active exercises to strengthen the shoulder muscles, improve stability, and regain functional abilities. This phase may involve exercises using resistance bands, weights, and other equipment. The therapist will also work on improving joint mobility and restoring proper movement patterns.

The duration and frequency of physical therapy sessions can vary but are typically scheduled two to three times per week initially, gradually tapering off as you regain strength and function. The therapist will continually assess your progress and adjust the treatment plan accordingly.

It's important to note that these timelines are general estimates, and individual recovery times may vary. Your surgeon and physical therapist will provide specific recommendations and create a personalized rehabilitation plan based on your unique circumstances and progress. Compliance with the recommended therapy program and active participation in exercises and home exercises are crucial for achieving the best outcomes and a successful recovery."

You can support cutting edge shoulder research that is leading to better care for patients with shoulder problems, click on this link.

Follow on twitter: https://twitter.com/shoulderarth
Follow on facebook: click on this link
Follow on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/frederick.matsen
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rick-matsen-88b1a8133/

Here are some videos that are of shoulder interest
Shoulder arthritis - what you need to know (see this link).
How to x-ray the shoulder (see this link).
The ream and run procedure (see this link).
The total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The cuff tear arthropathy arthroplasty (see this link).
The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The smooth and move procedure for irreparable rotator cuff tears (see this link).
Shoulder rehabilitation exercises (see this link)

Wednesday, April 5, 2023

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty - post operative therapy, outcomes, satisfaction and complications.

While "hands on" physical therapy can be helpful in many situations, it can also be time consuming, and expensive. Occasionally patients are pushed a bit too hard, resulting in increased discomfort or even injury.

The authors of Active physical therapy does not improve outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a multi-center, randomized clinical trial compared the range of motion (ROM) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between a structured home exercise program (HEP) consisting of a handout and a rope pulley and prescribed supervised physiotherapy (PT) after primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in a randomized clinical trial.

They attribute the home exercise program to Sarah Jackins, founding member of the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists (see this link).





All patients within this study received Grammont-style implants and did not undergo repair of the subscapularis. 89 patients were randomized, 43 to PT, and 46 to HEP. The authors obtained 1-year patient reported follow-up on 83 patients (93%) and ROM follow-up on 73 patients (82%). Nine patients (20%) crossed over from HEP to PT and 2 patients (4%) crossed over from PT to HEP.

It is of interest to see that the comfort and function of patients with RSA increased progressively over the first year after surgery.




Complications after reverse total shoulder occurred in one out of seven patients. (13% of HEP and 17% of PT patients).

Within the HEP group, the following complications occurred: 1 intraoperative humeral fracture, 1 case of postoperative ulnar neuritis, 1 postoperative fall that resulted in a brachial plexitis, 2 patients with instability, and 1 infection.

Within the PT group, the following complications occurred: 1 axillary nerve palsy, 1 case of postoperative carpal tunnel syndrome, 1 patient with instability, and 1 patient with stiffness.

Both groups had limitations in rotation, with the mean internal rotation being to the waist; only 48% (34/71) of patients experienced improvement in internal rotation with RSA.

12% (72/82) of patients described some symptoms of instability within 1-year postoperatively.

The satisfaction rate was 90% (74/82), but only 76% (62/82) stated that they would have the surgery again.

The authors concluded that "in this 2-center, randomized clinical trial, there were no significant differences in patient outcomes between HEP and PT after RSA. These findings suggest that it may not be necessary to recommend PT as a protocol for all patients after RSA".

You can support cutting edge shoulder research that is leading to better care for patients with shoulder problems, click on this link.

Follow on twitter: https://twitter.com/shoulderarth
Follow on facebook: click on this link
Follow on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/frederick.matsen
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rick-matsen-88b1a8133/

Here are some videos that are of shoulder interest
Shoulder arthritis - what you need to know (see this link).
How to x-ray the shoulder (see this link).
The ream and run procedure (see this link).
The total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The cuff tear arthropathy arthroplasty (see this link).
The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The smooth and move procedure for irreparable rotator cuff tears (see this link).
Shoulder rehabilitation exercises (see this link).

Thursday, March 19, 2020

Physical therapists as diagnosticians for shoulder disorders

Physiotherapists’ ability to diagnose and manage shoulder disorders in an outpatient orthopedic clinic: results from a concordance study

These authors evaluated the diagnostic, surgical triage, and medical imaging agreement between advanced practice physiotherapists (APPs) and orthopedic surgeons (OSs) for the management of patients with shoulder disorders in an outpatient orthopedic clinic.

50 patients referred to an OS for shoulder complaints were recruited and independently assessed by an OS and an APP. Each provider completed a standardized form indicating diagnosis, imaging test requests, and triage of surgical candidates.

Good diagnostic agreement was observed between the OSs and APPs  (k, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67-0.93).

Agreement for triage of surgical candidates was moderate (k, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.21-0.71) as APPs tended to refer patients more often to OSs for further evaluation. 

Imaging test request agreement was moderate as well (k, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.19-0.66). 

Patient satisfaction with care was high, with no significant differences found between providers (P . .70).

Comment: There is a strong rationale for having physical therapists evaluate patients with non-acute shoulder conditions as shown in this study. The optimal situation is to have the physical therapists seeing patients concurrently with the shoulder surgeon so that surgical consultation can be obtained, if necessary, at the same patient visit. This concurrency also allows the therapist and the surgeon to learn from each other to optimize accuracy and efficiency of evaluation and management. It is comforting for patients to know of a close partnership between PT and MD. A further advantage of this partnership is that surgical patients will often benefit from preoperative and postoperative therapy; this is facilitated if the patient and the PT know each other from the start.

There is a group, known as the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists, from around the country (http://www.asset-usa.org) that is built on the principles above.

===
To see our new series of youtube videos on important shoulder surgeries and how they are done, click here.

Use the "Search" box to the right to find other topics of interest to you.


You may be interested in some of our most visited web pages  arthritis, total shoulder, ream and run, reverse total shoulder, CTA arthroplasty, and rotator cuff surgery as well as the 'ream and run essentials'


Saturday, February 15, 2020

Reverse total shoulder - when to start PT?

A randomized single-blinded trial of early rehabilitation versus immobilization after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

These authors point out that the ideal rehabilitation program after a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has not been established.

They conducted a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial was performed enrolling patients from 2013 to 2017. Patients were randomly assigned at their 1-week follow-up to 1 of 2 groups: (1) delayed rehabilitation (sling immobilization with no passive or active motion of the shoulder for 6 weeks) or (2) immediate rehabilitation (immediate physical therapy for passive and active ROM and weaning of sling use as tolerated but no resistance training for 6 weeks).

86% of these patients had their RTSA for cuff tear arthropathy. Of an initial enrollment of 107 shoulders, 80.3% completed 1-year follow-up: 44 shoulders in the delayed-therapy group and 42 shoulders in the immediate-therapy group. 

Both groups had significantly improved forward flexion (32 improvement) and abduction (22 improvement) by 3 months.

Both groups showed significant improvements in ASES scores by 6 weeks (9.4-point improvement in composite score) with continued improvement through 6 months (35.1 points). 

Essentially no significant differences were found between groups for any postoperative measure.


No differences in complications, notching, or narcotic use were noted between groups. The immediate-therapy group had 1 glenosphere dissociation requiring surgery (<1 month postoperatively), 1 acromial stress fracture managed nonoperatively, and 1 postoperative pulmonary embolism. The delayed-therapy group had 1 prosthetic shoulder dislocation requiring surgery (<1 month postoperatively), 1 periprosthetic fracture (at 1 year postoperatively), 1 deep venous thromboembolism, and 1 case of lymphedema. 

Comment: This is a well done study. The authors addressed a dilemma: on one hand, it is tempting to immobilize the shoulder in hopes of minimizing the risk of instability; on the other hand, immobilization is disabling and can lead to falls especially in the elderly. 

Our practice is to customize the post RTSA rehabilitation based on (1) the trustworthiness, (2) the steadiness of the patient, and (3) the indications for the RTSA (noting that those having RSA for revision of a prior arthroplasty may be at increased risk for dislocation). For example, in a trustworthy but unsteady patient, we would endorse the patient's resumption of using a walker for support.

==
To see a YouTube of our technique for a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, click on this link.

=====
To see our new series of youtube videos on important shoulder surgeries and how they are done, click here.

Use the "Search" box to the right to find other topics of interest to you.


You may be interested in some of our most visited web pages  arthritis, total shoulder, ream and run, reverse total shoulder, CTA arthroplasty, and rotator cuff surgery as well as the 'ream and run essentials'





Friday, January 31, 2020

Acute cuff tears - PT or repair?

Surgery and physiotherapy were both successful in the treatment of small, acute, traumatic rotator cuff tears: a prospective randomized trial

These authors compared early surgical repair (n=32)  with nonoperative treatment (n=26) for traumatic supraspinatus tears using a 2-center randomized controlled trial. 

The mean age was 59.7 years; median sagittal tear size was one centimeter. 






All patients had a complete 12-month follow-up, except 3 patients who did all the clinical scores but refused followup MRI

They found no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the cuff repair and nonoperative groups. The repair group had a Constant-Murley median of 83 , mean 77±15, and the physiotherapy group median 78, mean 76±15 at 12 months, with the between-group difference in medians of 4.5 (5 to 9, 95% confidence interval; P . .68). The corresponding values for the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index were 91% (QR, 24) vs. 86% (QR, 24), with the between-group difference of 5.0 (4 to 9, 95% confidence interval; P ..62). There was no difference in Numerical Rating Scale or in Euro quality-of-life-visual analog scale. 




Retears were found in 6.5% of repaired patients and tear progression >5 mm in 29.2% of unrepaired patients. There were two infections in patients having repair (one was a crossover from the PT group).

Comment: This a virtually unique randomized study comparing PT and surgery for acute suprapspinatus tears. While the clinical outcomes were not significantly different, the tear progression in the unrepaired tendons is of concern and must be balanced against the retear rate and complications in the surgical group. 

=====
We have a new set of shoulder youtubes about the shoulder, check them out at this link.

Be sure to visit "Ream and Run - the state of the art" regarding this radically conservative approach to shoulder arthritis at this link and this link

Use the "Search" box to the right to find other topics of interest to you.


You may be interested in some of our most visited web pages arthritis, total shoulder, ream and run, reverse total shoulder, CTA arthroplasty, and rotator cuff surgery as well as the 'ream and run essentials'


Wednesday, October 31, 2018

Rotator cuff tears in patients 65 years and older - how are they treated?

Treatment for Rotator Cuff Tear Is Influenced by Demographics and Characteristics of the Area Where Patients Live

These authors used the 2010 to 2012 Medicare administrative database to investigate factors related to the treatment selected for atraumatic rotator cuff tears documented.

Among 32,203 patients who were identified as having a new, symptomatic,MRI-confirmed atraumatic rotator cuff tears 19.8% were managed with initial surgery; 41.3%, with initial physical therapy; and 38.8%, with watchful waiting. 

Patients who were older, had more comorbidity, or were female, of non-white race, or dual-eligible for Medicaid were less likely to receive surgery (p < 0.0001). 

Black, dual-eligible females had 0.42-times lower odds of surgery and 2.36-times greater odds of watchful waiting.

Covariate-adjusted odds of surgery varied dramatically across hospital referral regions; unadjusted surgery and physical therapy rates varied from 0% to 73% and from 6% to 74%, respectively. 

On average, patients in high-surgery areas were 62% more likely to receive surgery than the average patient with identical measured characteristics. Patients in low-surgery areas were half as likely to receive surgery than the average comparable patient. 

The supply of orthopaedic surgeons and the supply of physical therapists were associated with greater use of initial surgery and physical therapy, respectively.

The authors concluded that patient characteristics had a significant influence on treatment for atraumatic rotator cuff tear but did not explain the wide-ranging variation in treatment rates across areas. Local-area physician supply and specialty mix were correlated with treatment, independent of the patient’s measured characteristics.

Comment: This is a most interesting study. Only 20% of these new symptomatic cuff tears were treated with initial surgery and selection is biased by the type of provider (surgeon vs non surgeon) that the patient is likely to have seen as well as the likely insurance reimbursement for the care received (Medicare vs the lower reimbursing Medicaid dual-eligibility).

Thus study does not answer the important question: is an atraumatic tear in someone over the age of 65 a problem that shoulder receive surgery as its initial management? The very meaning of "atraumatic" suggests that there is an opportunity for non-operative management without a rush to the  OR as initial management.  

Wouldn't it be wonderful if the Medicare database included the patients self-assessed shoulder comfort and function at the time of the initial visit and one year later. With these data we'd be closer answering the question: "do older patients with atraumatic cuff tears fare better if they receive surgical treatment?"

Here's my atraumatic cuff tear

And here's my shoulder function with non-operative management


=====
We have a new set of shoulder youtubes about the shoulder, check them out at this link.

Use the "Search" box to the right to find other topics of interest to you.


You may be interested in some of our most visited web pages   arthritis, total shoulder, ream and run, reverse total shoulder, CTA arthroplasty, and rotator cuff surgery as well as the 'ream and run essentials'

Sunday, November 13, 2016

Rotator cuff tears - what about non-operative management?


Initial medical management of rotator cuff tears: a demographic analysis of surgical and nonsurgical treatment in the United States Medicare population.


These authors find that rotator cuff tears have a lifetime incidence between 25% and 40% in the United States. They evaluated the proportions of patients treated with nonoperative and operative modalities during an 8-year period (2005-2012) among patients with Medicare.

During the study period, 878,049 patients were identified; 397,116 patients had rotator cuff repair.

The proportion of patients treated initially with physical therapy dropped from 30.0% in 2005 to 13.2% in 2012



 The proportion of patients who had rotator cuff repair increased from 33.8% to 40.4% from 2005 to 2012 (P < .001).














The surgical treatment of a chronic cuff tear is elective. In that many tears are minimally symptomatic it seems reasonable to see if non-operative management can be helpful. This post is relevant, especially in light of the high rate of failure of repair surgery and the results with non-operative management:

42% failure rate for rotator cuff repair - are the patient's genes at fault?

 Is surgery better than non-operative treatment for non-traumatic rotator cuff tears?


Rotator cuff tears - non-operative and arthroscopic management

Rotator cuff tears - getting better without surgery

===



Information about shoulder exercises can be found at this link.

Use the "Search" box to the right to find other topics of interest to you.

You may be interested in some of our most visited web pages including:shoulder arthritis, total shoulder, ream and run, reverse total shoulder, CTA arthroplasty, and rotator cuff surgery as well as the 'ream and run essentials'


Wednesday, April 20, 2016

Rotator Cuff Repair Compared with Therapy


"Rotator Cuff Repair Compared with Therapy

Patient outcomes of primary tendon repair compared with those of physical therapy were reported from a randomized controlled trial of 103 patients with rotator cuff tears not exceeding 3 cm. Patients were followed at 6 months and at 1, 2, and 5 years with a 98% follow-up rate. Twelve of 51 patients in the physical therapy group underwent secondary rotator cuff repair. Patients in the primary repair group had significantly better group-mean improvements on the Constant score (5.3 points), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (9.0 points), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain (1.1 cm), and VAS for patient satisfaction (1.0 cm) compared with patients who underwent secondary repair. This difference may be below clinical importance. In 37% of patients treated with physical therapy only, there were increasing tear sizes on ultrasound that were >5 mm and these were associated with inferior outcomes."

Comment: Our review of this article was a bit different: These authors performed a remarkable Level I intention to treat analysis of 103 cases of small acute or chronic cuff tears (3 cm or less) confirmed by both MRI and sonography that did not have stiffness or substantial muscle atrophy. Cases were block randomized to either (a) repair (with or without biceps surgery) or (b) supervised physical therapy (PT) with the possibility of secondary repair. Secondary surgery was offered to patients in the PT group if symptoms persisted after 15 PT visits. Clinical and sonographic followup was 98% at 5 years.

The authors selected the Constant Score as the primary outcome of interest. This score was only slightly better for the group having surgical repair: 79.8 ± 15.0 as compared to 74.2 ± 20.3 for the PT group. P = .05.

The failure rates in the two groups were comparable:
(1) Over 14 of the tears treated with PT had progression of the tear size > 5mm, some related to trauma. It is not possible to know if repair of these tears would have been successful. Twelve nonoperative patients reported an insufficient treatment effect and desired surgical treatment.

(2) For the surgical patients, a re-tear (or non-healing) was diagnosed 15 patients. The recurrent defect was full-thickness in eight patients (13%) and a partial-thickness in seven patients (12%). These are essentially the same results as found in the classic article by Harryman et al reported over two decades ago.  There was no mention of whether complications occurred in the surgery group. It is not stated if the re-tears required repeat surgery.

A biceps tenodesis was performed in over one third of cases in the primary tendon repair group; no biceps tenodeses were performed in the physical therapy group. Thus, if over 1/3 of patients in this series had biceps tendon pathology, this pathology went untreated in the PT group.   One could wonder if such untreated pathology might have accounted for the small difference in the two outcomes.

Our approach to rotator cuff tears remains unaltered: acute tears resulting in a substantial change of shoulder function deserve strong consideration for prompt surgical repair if the patient is healthy and active as long as there is no reason to believe the tendon is of poor quantity or quality (i.e. patient is elderly, a smoker, has had steroid injections, has atrophy, massive tear, retraction).

Chronic tears deserve a good try at non operative management. If non-operative management is not successful, consideration can be given to a smooth and move or a repair depending on the quantity and quality of the tissue encountered at surgery.

===
Consultation for those who live a distance away from Seattle.

Click here to see the new Shoulder Arthritis Book

Click here to see the new Rotator Cuff Book

To see the topics covered in this Blog, click here

Use the "Search" box to the right to find other topics of interest to you.

You may be interested in some of our most visited web pages including:shoulder arthritis, total shoulder, ream and run, reverse total shoulder, CTA arthroplasty, and rotator cuff surgery as well as the 'ream and run essentials'


Monday, September 29, 2014

Shoulder Arthritis: The Cliff Notes for Physical Therapists and Other People


Glenohumeral Arthritis

The Cliff Notes for Physical Therapists and Other People

For the complete Shoulder Arthritis Book, click here.

I. Anatomy and mechanics – the glenohumeral joint represents a wonderful balance of mobility and stability. The socket is very shallow so that the humeral head is stabilized by concavity compression in which the cuff muscles press the ball into the socket. In the normal shoulder about 2/3rds of the motion is at the glenohumeral joint and 1/3 at the scapulothoracic joint. We are humbled by the challenge of trying to ‘fix’ this complex joint when it goes awry.

II. Definition – glenohumeral arthritis is a condition in which the articular cartilage normally covering the humeral head and glenoid is compromised. There are different types of shoulder arthritis. Usually it is not an inflammatory condition – such as rheumatoid arthritis - as the ‘-itis’ implies, but rather a degenerative, post traumatic or post surgical condition. Other diagnoses often lumped in with glenohumeral arthritis include avascular necrosis, cuff tear arthropathy, post-septic arthritis and chondrolysis from the intra-articular infusion of local anesthetics. Glenohumeral arthritis needs to be distinguished from two other common diagnoses, frozen shoulder and rotator cuff tear.

III. Presentation - glenohumeral arthritis causes loss of comfort and function of the shoulder. A practical way to assess the functional loss of an arthritic glenohumeral joint is with the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) . The SST is a valuable tool and the patient’s responses should be recorded at each visit to the therapist.

Summarizing the SST responses for over three thousand patients presenting for shoulder arthroplasty, we find the following percentages of patients able to perform each of the functions.




IV. Diagnosis – the diagnosis of glenohumeral arthritis requires a good history, examination of the active and passive ranges of motion and proper standardized x-rays. The history should elicit past trauma, prior treatment, prior shoulder surgery, systemic disease, medications (such as steroids), and involvement of other joints. The range of active and passive abduction, flexion, cross body adduction, reach up the back, external rotation at the side, and internal rotation of the abducted arm are usually diminished in glenohumeral arthritis. In performing these examinations, it is important to determine how much of the motion is humeroscapular and how much of the motion is scapulothoracic. The technique for taking the key x-rays for documenting the presence of arthritis is shown here. Here are examples of an AP view and an axillary view showing a normal joint space and the absence of bone spurs.



By contrast, an osteoarthritic glenohumeral joint often shows osteophytes, loose bodies, glenoid retroversion, glenoid biconcavity, and posterior subluxation of the humeral head on the glenoid as shown here.




See also this post that shows the x-ray characteristics of the different types of glenohumeral arthritis. One of the most difficult diagnoses to manage is chondrolysis resulting from the intra-articular infusion of local anesthetics with a pain pump. This condition is devastating because it occurs in young individuals having instability surgery, because it can completely destroy the articular cartilage, and because it is usually accompanied by soft tissue disease that results in pain and stiffness, even after joint replacement. Other challenging diagnoses are post-traumatic or post-surgical arthritis – both of which can distort the local anatomy requiring special modifications of the standard procedure that would be used for straightforward osteoarthritis. Shoulder arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis may be complicated by the soft bone, the fragile rotator cuff, severe bone erosion, and shoulder tightness.

V. Progression – glenohumeral osteoarthritis (the most common form in the U.S.) usually starts subtly with only minor symptoms at night or during certain activities. It then progresses at a highly variable rate – sometimes not changing from year to year, sometimes with a sudden worsening and sometimes with an up and down course over the seasons or years. On occasion the x-rays may appear much worse than the symptoms. “End stage” arthritis can leave the glenohumeral joint without any range of motion.

VI. Evaluation – as William Osler said, ‘it is as important to know what patient the disease has than what disease the patient has’. We are on the lookout for the 3 “D”s, diseases, depression, and dependency on nicotine, narcotics or alcohol, which can compromise the patient’s ability to respond to non-operative or operative management. The best prognostic factors are a healthy patient with a positive attitude and good social support. Patient selection is the principal key to successful surgery.

VII. Non-operative management – because surgery for glenohumeral arthritis is elective, patients have plenty of time to try to optimize their comfort and function with non-operative management. We focus on three areas of patient self-management: (1) avoidance of impact and heavy compressive loading, (2) range of motion – (exercises A,B,C,E,F,G and L on this post). and (3) traction exercises. We do not use glucosamine, chondroitin, cortisone injections, hyaluronic acid injections, ultrasound, or muscle stimulation. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications may be useful, but caution is exerted to avoid cardiac, renal, liver, gastric and hematological complications. See also this post on non surgical management..

VIII. Surgical options – the different surgical procedures for glenohumeral arthritis are discussed in detail here. The first consideration is whether it is appropriate to consider surgical treatment at this time. . Shoulders with bad looking x-rays are not taken to the operating room if the patient doesn’t have substantial functional deficits, if the patient is not a good candidate for surgery for health or social reasons, if the patient does not wish to accept the risks of surgery, or if the surgeon is not comfortable with what needs to be done. The common forms of arthroplasty and the common conditions for which they are performed are listed below and here.

a. Hemiarthroplasty – avascular necrosis when the glenoid is intact

b. Total shoulder arthroplasty – osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, capsulorrhaphy arthropathy, post traumatic arthritis

c. Ream and run - osteoarthritis, capsulorrhaphy arthropathy, posttraumatic arthritis in patients wishing to avoid the risks and limitations associated with a prosthetic polyethylene glenoid component.

d. Cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) arthroplasty – this procedure is used for the arthritic, cuff deficient shoulder that has an intact, stabilizing coracoacromial arch.

e. Reverse total shoulder – rotator cuff tear arthropathy, pseudoparalysis, failed total shoulder arthroplasty with rotator cuff insufficiency. Patients considering this procedure are cautioned about the limited range of motion and function usually achieved with this surgery and also about the increased risk of fracture or fixation failure with falls.

Each of these procedures modifies the arthritic anatomy by removing abutting bone, and inserting smooth prosthetic joint surfaces that enable motion, stability and load transfer. Each procedure involves careful balancing of the capsule and other surrounding soft tissues. The procedure may include a biceps tenotomy or tenodesis if the long head tendon of the biceps is frayed or unstable.

The use of these different surgical options varies widely among different surgeons. This variation in use confounds the development of appropriateness criteria and the evaluation of outcomes. For example, surgeons who use the reverse total shoulder for milder disease will have better results than those who use it primarily after a salvage procedure after more conservative procedures have failed or when there is no other option.

IX. Postoperative care – the rehabilitation program after surgery depends on the details of the surgery performed, the specific findings at surgery, and the patient. In our practice we try to standardize and simplify the postoperative program for almost all arthroplasties. We use continuous passive motion while the patient is in the hospital and start assisted elevation the evening of surgery. Our goal is to have the patient be able to perform assisted elevation to at least 150 degrees by the time of discharge on the second postoperative day. Forward elevation stretches are done 5 times a day with a 2 minute hold. We do not work on external rotation range until after six weeks, allowing for solid healing of the subscapularis repair and then we only have the patient do very gentle stretching At six weeks we often add all of the exercises shown here. Gentle progressive strengthening is progressed from there, make sure that any exercise can be repeated at least 20 times. This program is modified if there are concerns about instability or the quality of the repairs. If the shoulder is stiff at six weeks, we consider a closed manipulation. After a reverse total shoulder we immobilize the arm in a sling for six weeks and then allow the patient to progress with gentle activities of daily living.

X. Complications – surgery for glenohumeral arthritis may yield unsatisfactory results or be associated with complications as shown here. These complications may include persistent pain, nerve injury, cuff or subscapularis failure, stiffness, instability, fracture, component loosening and infection.

XI. Expected outcomes – the results of glenohumeral arthroplasty are determined by the characteristics of (1) the shoulder problem, (2) the patient, (3) the procedure and (4) the team providing the care. We refer to these as the 4P s. We let patients know we cannot guarantee a specified result, but we do assure them of our best efforts to improve their shoulder’s comfort and function.

XII. The future – much hope has been placed on ‘biological resurfacing’ with interpositional grafts of cadaver meniscus or artificial materials. These however have get to yield durable results, probably because of the mortar and pestle action of the humeral head and glenoid on the interposed material. While ‘tissue-engineering’ sounds attractive, attempts to grow cartilage and implant it in a human joint have been frustrated. The most promising regenerative procedure in our view is the ream and run procedure in which the healing response of concentrically reamed glenoid bone is molded by a smooth, round humeral head prosthesis. This procedure appears to enable the glenoid to cover itself with fibrocartilage bonded to the underlying bone.

XIII. Role of the therapist – in a word, essential. Ideally the patient and therapist get to know each other before surgery, sharing the program and the plan for ongoing communication. In the hospital the therapist starts the rehab program and assures the patient is ‘on top of it’ before discharge. After discharge the therapist is available on an ongoing basis for answering questions, measuring progress, and alerting the surgeon to any deviations from the expected recovery.

Thursday, September 18, 2014

Which is better physical therapy or surgical repair for rotator cuff tears of 3 cm or less

Tendon Repair Compared with Physiotherapy in the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tears

These authors have performed a remarkable Level I intention to treat analysis of 103 cases of small acute or chronic cuff tears (3 cm or less) confirmed by both MRI and sonography that did not have stiffness or substantial muscle atrophy. Cases were block randomized to either (a) repair (with or without biceps surgery) or (b) supervised physical therapy (PT) with the possibility of secondary repair. Secondary surgery was offered to patients in the PT group if symptoms persisted after 15 PT visits. Clinical and sonographic followup was 98% at 5 years.

The authors selected the Constant Score as the primary outcome of interest. This score was only slightly better for the group having surgical repair: 79.8 ± 15.0 as compared to 74.2 ± 20.3 for the PT group. P = .05.

The failure rates in the two groups were comparable:
(1) Over 14 of the tears treated with PT had progression of the tear size > 5mm, some related to trauma. It is not possible to know if repair of these tears would have been successful. Twelve nonoperative patients reported an insufficient treatment effect and desired surgical treatment.

(2) For the surgical patients, a re-tear (or non-healing) was diagnosed 15 patients. The recurrent defect was full-thickness in eight patients (13%) and a partial-thickness in seven patients (12%). These are essentially the same results as found in the classic article by Harryman et al reported over two decades ago.  There was no mention of whether complications occurred in the surgery group. It is not stated if the re-tears required repeat surgery.

A biceps tenodesis was performed in over one third of cases in the primary tendon repair group; no biceps tenodeses were performed in the physical therapy group. Thus, if over 1/3 of patients in this series had biceps tendon pathology, this pathology went untreated in the PT group.   One could wonder if such untreated pathology might have accounted for the small difference in the two outcomes.

Comment: Our approach to rotator cuff tears remains unaltered: acute tears resulting in a substantial change of shoulder function deserve strong consideration for prompt surgical repair if the patient is healthy and active as long as there is no reason to believe the tendon is of poor quantity or quality (i.e. patient is elderly, a smoker, has had steroid injections, has atrophy, massive tear, retraction).

Chronic tears deserve a good try at non operative management. If non-operative management is not successful, consideration can be given to a smooth and move or a repair depending on the quantity and quality of the tissue encountered at surgery.

===
Consultation for those who live a distance away from Seattle.

Click here to see the new Shoulder Arthritis Book

Click here to see the new Rotator Cuff Book

To see the topics covered in this Blog, click here

Use the "Search" box to the right to find other topics of interest to you.

You may be interested in some of our most visited web pages including:shoulder arthritis, total shoulder, ream and run, reverse total shoulder, CTA arthroplasty, and rotator cuff surgery as well as the 'ream and run essentials'









Monday, October 7, 2013

Salute to The American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists (ASSET)

Here a video of my greeting to the coming meeting of the The American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists (ASSET), a group of multidisciplinary professionals in the area of shoulder and elbow rehabilitation who place a high value on efficacious exemplary patient care.

The American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists (ASSET) was founded in 1991. They are a group of physical therapists, occupational therapists and athletic trainers with a common interest in rehabilitation of the shoulder and elbow. They promote improved clinical care based on basic science, knowledge of surgical procedure and clinical research.

We are proud of our association with them!
 

===
To see the topics covered in this Blog, click here

Use the "Search" box to the right to find other topics of interest to you.

You may be interested in some of our most visited web pages including:shoulder arthritis, total shoulder, ream and run, reverse total shoulder, CTA arthroplasty, rotator cuff surgery, 'ream and run essentials' and consultation for shoulder arthritis.