Showing posts with label eccentric humeral head. Show all posts
Showing posts with label eccentric humeral head. Show all posts

Thursday, October 31, 2024

Cost saving techniques vs technology: bilateral osteoarthritis in an active 60 year old man. 7 year followup and sad news

An active man from a state on the opposite side of the country presented with pain and limited function in both shoulders. His Simple Shoulder Tests are shown below.


Standard plain x-rays of the right shoulder showed severe osteoarthritis, loose bodies, and posterior humeral decentering on a biconcave retroverted (B2) glenoid seen on the axillary truth view.


Standard plain x-rays of the left shoulder showed severe osteoarthritis, loose bodies, and humeral head centering on a monoconcave, non-retroverted (A2) glenoid as seen on the axillary truth view.


After discussion of the alternatives of anatomic and reverse total shoulder, he elected a ream and run procedure to avoid the risks and limitations associated with the other two procedures.

The procedures were performed 6 months apart with no preoperative CT or MRI and no 3D planning. General anesthesia was used without a nerve block. The biceps tendons were preserved. The glenoids were conservatively reamed to a single concavity. No attempt was made to change or "correct" glenoid version on either side. Smooth standard length humeral stems were fixed with impaction autografting. On the right side an anteriorly eccentric humeral head component was used to manage posterior  humeral decentering. 

He returned for routine followup 7 years after his ream and run procedures. He could perform 11/12 Simple Shoulder Test functions on each side. 

His 7 year followup x-rays are shown below. Note the absence of the stress shielding that has been associated with other stem designs. Note the absence of glenoid erosion with this standard chrome-cobalt humeral head. Note also the centering of the anteriorly eccentric humeral head on the retroverted glenoid of the right shoulder. 



The patient was pleased with the outcome. 


Of note the costs of CT scans, 3-D planning, brachial plexus blocks, polyethylene glenoids, cement, pyrocarbon humeral heads, special ingrowth humeral stems and reverse total shoulders were avoided without compromise of the clinical outcome.

Sadly, the DePuy Global Advantage simple, standard-length, uncoated humeral stem that had reliably served patients like this man for decades 
is no longer manufactured, in spite of its excellent service record, low cost, and lack of implant related complications. It has been "replaced" by more complex and more expensive stems, some of the many "options" are shown here.


You can support cutting edge shoulder research that is leading to better care for patients with shoulder problems, click on this link

Please join us for the AAOS Infection course!!!



Follow on twitter/X: https://x.com/RickMatsen
Follow on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/shoulder.arthritis
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rick-matsen-88b1a8133/

Here are some videos that are of shoulder interest
Shoulder arthritis - what you need to know (see this link).
How to x-ray the shoulder (see this link).
The ream and run procedure (see this link).
The total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The cuff tear arthropathy arthroplasty (see this link).
The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The smooth and move procedure for irreparable rotator cuff tears (see this link).
Shoulder rehabilitation exercises (see this link). 


Friday, June 28, 2024

A 31 year old with a severe type B2 glenoid after prior labral surgery.

 A 31 year old athletic man was referred from the opposite corner of the U.S. with a history of shoulder problems since the age of 16 having been diagnosed with a torn posterior labrum from pitching baseball. He continued to participate in weight training, golf and football. A decade later he had progressive and substantial pain and difficulty raising his arm. His symptoms were aggravated by a motorcycle accident. At that point he had a "posterior labrum slap tear surgery".  Five years later he had increased shoulder pain and limitation that had not responded to dedicated physical therapy. His shoulder images at that time are shown below.








On his initial visit with us, his shoulder examination showed stiffness and pain on motion but excellent muscle strength.


His Simple Shoulder Test at that visit is shown below


Our standard series of plain films (including the axillary "truth" view) showed substantial posterior decentering when the arm was placed in a functional position of elevation.





After discussion of the risks and benefits of the surgical alternatives, he elected to proceed with a ream and run procure to avoid the potential issues with a plastic glenoid component. Preoperative CT planning was not used. The procedure was performed under general anesthesia without a nerve block. The shoulder was approached through a deltopectoral interval with a subscapularis peel rather than a lesser tuberosity osteotomy. The biceps tendon was preserved as was the glenoid labrum. The glenoid was conservatively reamed just enough to create a single concavity and without attempting to change glenoid version. A thin (8 mm) smooth stem was impaction grafted into the medullary canal. A 56 mm anteriorly eccentric humeral head was selected to manage the posterior laxity. 

He did a superior job of his rehabilitation, keeping in close touch with us, although he lives over 3,000 miles away. A year after surgery he reported that he could perform 12/12 of the functions of the Simple Shoulder Test.


At two years after surgery he provided these x-rays showing no evidence of stress shielding, a stable thin smooth humeral component, a centered anteriorly eccentric humeral head, and a completely remodeled stable glenoid articular surface. 




Recently, at four years after surgery, he shared a couple of videos of his workouts.



Comment: Managing shoulder arthritis in a young active person is a challenge for some important reasons: the pathology is more complex (as seen in this case) than what is usually found in degenerative arthritis in older patients, the patient has a long projected postoperative lifespan, and the patient generally has high activity aspirations. Each of these factors places special demands on the procedure selected, on the surgical technique, the rehabilitation program, and on the patient-surgeon partnership.

You can support cutting edge shoulder research that is leading to better care for patients with shoulder problems, click on this link

Follow on twitter/X: https://x.com/RickMatsen
Follow on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/shoulder.arthritis
Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rick-matsen-88b1a8133/

Contact: shoulderarthritis@uw.edu

Here are some videos that are of shoulder interest
Shoulder arthritis - what you need to know (see this link).
How to x-ray the shoulder (see this link).
The ream and run procedure (see this link).
The total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The cuff tear arthropathy arthroplasty (see this link).
The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The smooth and move procedure for irreparable rotator cuff tears (see this link).

Shoulder rehabilitation exercises (see this link). 

Thursday, October 20, 2022

Fracture sequelae in an active woman.

An active woman in her mid 60's presented with pain and loss of function of her left shoulder resulting from a proximal humeral fracture sustained in a bike crash twenty years prior. Her preoperative x-rays show a malunited proximal humeral fracture with humeral head articular surface irregularity and subchondral bone resorption.


Because of her active lifestyle, she elected a hemiarthroplasty with a posteriorly eccentric humeral head and an impaction grafted standard smooth stem. No glenoid arthroplasty was needed. The rotator cuff was essentially intact.

Seven years after surgery at the age of 73 she returned for routine followup with full comfortable motion and function. Her activities ranged from playing piano and flute to swimming, shot put and discus. Her postoperative films show a securely fixed humeral stem without evidence of stress shielding, a well centered humeral head, and substantial radiographic joint space.





Her active elevation is shown below.


Comment: 
 This case demonstrates the value of a conservative hemiarthroplasty in a highly motivated patient.

You can support cutting edge shoulder research that is leading to better care for patients with shoulder problems, click on this link.

To add this blog to your reading list in Google Chrome, click on the reading list icon



Follow on twitter: https://twitter.com/shoulderarth

Follow on facebook: click on this link

Follow on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/frederick.matsen

Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rick-matsen-88b1a8133/

Here are some videos that are of shoulder interest
Shoulder arthritis - what you need to know (see this link).
How to x-ray the shoulder (see this link).
The ream and run procedure (see this link).
The total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The cuff tear arthropathy arthroplasty (see this link).
The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (see this link).
The smooth and move procedure for irreparable rotator cuff tears (see this link).
Shoulder rehabilitation exercises (see this link).

Wednesday, April 3, 2019

The versatility of a standard humeral implant in managing post fracture deformity

A sixty year old woman, BMI 54, presented to us with pain and stiffness of her left shoulder 10 years after a proximal humeral fracture. Her x-rays showed a severe proximal humeral malunion.




In such cases, discussion of the best prosthetic approach may include resurfacing, short stem humeral component and reverse total shoulder.

In this case a standard impaction grafted smooth stem with a posteriorly eccentric humeral head was used without a glenoid component



=====
We have a new set of shoulder youtubes about the shoulder, check them out at this link.

Be sure to visit "Ream and Run - the state of the art" regarding this radically conservative approach to shoulder arthritis at this link and this link

Use the "Search" box to the right to find other topics of interest to you.

Friday, January 20, 2017

Managing intraoperative posterior instability encountered during total shoulder arthroplasty

Plication of the posterior capsule for intraoperative posterior instability during anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty

These authors have found that "restoration of soft tissue balance for intraoperative posterior instability during anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is particularly difficult". In their experience when excessive intraoperative posterior subluxation is noted at the time of TSA, a number of changes may be trialed to achieve adequate soft tissue balance. Provided component version and bone loss management have been optimized, they find that trial heads of increasing thickness may be used to tension the posterior capsule and cuff while still allowing subscapularis repair. However, in some shoulders, they find that intraoperative posterior subluxation continues. In these circumstances, they consider posterior capsular plication (PCP).

The purpose of their study was to report the outcomes, complications, and reoperations of 38 primary TSAs in which a posterior capsular plication (PCP) was performed to correct excessive intraoperative posterior subluxation. 

Their approach was to proceed with a standard prosthetic glenoid arthroplasty performed through a deltopectoral approach.  After implantation of the glenoid component, the humeral head trial  was placed and stability evaluated. When posterior subluxation  of >40% to 50%, the head size thickness and diameter were  increased in an attempt to tension the posterior soft tissues while  still allowing subscapularis closure. In all shoulders included in this report, posterior subluxation persisted and a PCP was added.  A bone hook was used to retract the humerus laterally to create  a working space for the PCP procedure. Then, multiple nonabsorbable sutures were placed lateral to medial to shorten the posterior capsule. All the sutures were first placed and then the bone hook was removed to allow adequate tightening of the sutures as they are tied.

They found that PCP resulted in restoration of soft tissue balance in 27 shoulders (71%). The remaining 11 shoulders had evidence of posterior subluxation, including posterior dislocation in 2 shoulders. Revision surgery was performed in 3 shoulders (7.9%), all for instability. However, there was a high rate of radiographic glenoid component loosening (12 shoulders, 32%). Overall results were excellent in 24 (63.2%), satisfactory in 10 (26.3%), and unsatisfactory in 4 (10.5%) shoulders. Recurrence of posterior subluxation was associated with worse motion and strength as well as with a higher rate of glenoid component loosening. The type of glenoid wear did not affect, with the numbers available, the radiographic or clinical/functional outcomes in this study.

Comment: We agree with the authors that intraoperative decentering of the trial humeral head component needs to be identified and managed at surgery. Because the surgical exposure and osteophyte resection can alter the soft tissue balance, preoperative clinical and radiographic evaluation may not correspond to what is observed at surgery. 

In the past we tried posterior capsular plication and found that the tightening had a tendency to fail, either because the sutures pulled through the attenuated posterior soft tissue or because the posterior capsule stretched out with time. As a result our current approach for the management of intraoperative posterior decentering employes anteriorly eccentric humeral heads without or with rotator interval plication. Shoulders treated with this approach have not appeared to have problems with recurrent posterior instability, suggesting that this may be a more robust approach than PCP.

A prior blog post on this topic is reproduced here:
Management of intraoperative posterior decentering in shoulder arthroplasty using anteriorly eccentric humeral head components 

This article reports the use of anteriorly-eccentric humeral head components to manage posterior instability recognized at shoulder arthroplasty when standard trial components are in place. Radiographic centering was characterized before surgery and at follow-up on standardized axillary radiographs with the arm held in a position of functional elevation. Preoperative posterior humeral head decentering did not correlate with preoperative glenoid version.

In 33 shoulder arthroplasties with 2-year outcomes the preoperative radiographic humeral decentering was reduced from 10.4% ± 7.9% to 0.9% ± 2.3% postoperatively (P < .001). SST scores improved from 4.8 ± 2.3 to 10.0 ± 2.3 (P < .001).  Glenoid retroversion was 19.8° ± 8.9° preoperatively and 15.5° ± 7.5° postoperatively. Rotator interval plication was performed in 16 cases as an adjunctive stabilizing procedure. No cases of postoperative instability were identified.

Posterior instability after a shoulder arthroplasty can result in pain, functional loss and rocking horse loosening or rim wear of a glenoid component.

While posterior decentering can be identified before surgery by the 'truth' view (an axillary taken with the arm in a functional position of elevation in the plane of the scapula) as shown below


often this preoperative posterior instability will respond to soft tissue balancing and use of standard humeral components. In other cases, the posterior instability persists at surgery, being manifest by a posterior 'drop back' when the arm is elevated. 


Not infrequently a shoulder without apparent posterior instability before surgery becomes posteriorly unstable at surgery after osteophyte resection and soft tissue releases. 

In cases where posterior instability is identified at surgery when trial components are in place, centering of the humeral head can usually be established through the use of an anteriorly eccentric humeral head without or with a rotator interval plication.




resulting in a stabilized head without needing to change glenoid version. Below is the postoperative view of the case shown in the earlier x-ray in which these methods were used.


See these related posts:
===


Check out the new Shoulder Arthritis Book - click here.


Use the "Search" box to the right to find other topics of interest to you.

You may be interested in some of our most visited web pages including:shoulder arthritis, total shoulder, ream and runreverse total shoulderCTA arthroplasty, and rotator cuff surgery as well as the 'ream and run essentials'





Wednesday, January 18, 2017

Humeral component eccentricity - getting it right

A 70 year old patient presented with painful clunking in the left shoulder after a prior arthroplasty. The anteroposterior view shown below indicates well fixed humeral and glenoid components. 


However, the 'truth' view, revealed a posteriorly sublimated humeral head that had been placed with the eccentricity directed posteriorly.

At the revision surgery, we found that the glenoid component was well fixed, but that the posterior glenoid polyethylene was severely eroded. We removed the glenoid component, smoothed the residual glenoid bone, placed an anteriorly eccentric humeral component, and performed a rotator interval plication.

At surgery and as seen in the postoperative 'truth' view,  the shoulder is now posteriorly stable.
Comment: This case demonstrates the value of the 'truth' view as well as the importance of proper orientation of humeral head eccentricity.

More about the 'truth' view can be seen here,  here, and here.

==

Consultation for those who live a distance away from Seattle.

Click here to see the new Shoulder Arthritis Book.

Click here to see the new Rotator Cuff Book

Information about shoulder exercises can be found at this link.

Use the "Search" box to the right to find other topics of interest to you.

You may be interested in some of our most visited web pages including:shoulder arthritis, total shoulder, ream and runreverse total shoulderreverse total shoulder patient information,  CTA arthroplasty, and rotator cuff surgery as well as the 'ream and run essentials'

See from which cities our patients come.




Friday, November 18, 2016

Shoulder arthroplasty - avoiding posterior instability

Management of intraoperative posterior decentering in shoulder arthroplasty using anteriorly eccentric humeral head components 

These authors report the use of anteriorly-eccentric humeral head components to manage posterior instability recognized at shoulder arthroplasty when standard trial components are in place. Radiographic centering was characterized before surgery and at follow-up on standardized axillary radiographs with the arm held in a position of functional elevation. Preoperative posterior humeral head decentering did not correlate with preoperative glenoid version.

In 33 shoulder arthroplasties with 2-year outcomes the preoperative radiographic humeral decentering was reduced from 10.4% ± 7.9% to 0.9% ± 2.3% postoperatively (P < .001). SST scores improved from 4.8 ± 2.3 to 10.0 ± 2.3 (P < .001).  Glenoid retroversion was 19.8° ± 8.9° preoperatively and 15.5° ± 7.5° postoperatively. Rotator interval plication was performed in 16 cases as an adjunctive stabilizing procedure.

Comment: Posterior instability after a shoulder arthroplasty can result in pain, functional loss and rocking horse loosening or rim wear of a glenoid component.

While posterior decentering can be identified before surgery by the 'truth' view (an axillary taken with the arm in a functional position of elevation in the plane of the scapula) as shown below


often this preoperative posterior instability will respond to soft tissue balancing and use of standard humeral components. In other cases, the posterior instability persists at surgery, being manifest by a posterior 'drop back' when the arm is elevated. 


Not infrequently a shoulder without apparent posterior instability before surgery becomes posteriorly unstable at surgery after osteophyte resection and soft tissue releases. 

In cases where posterior instability is identified at surgery when trial components are in place, centering of the humeral head can usually be established through the use of an anteriorly eccentric humeral head without or with a rotator interval plication.




resulting in a stabilized head without needing to change glenoid version. Below is the postoperative view of the case shown in the earlier x-ray in which these methods were used.


See these related posts:
Ream and Run - surgical technique

===


Check out the new Shoulder Arthritis Book - click here.


Use the "Search" box to the right to find other topics of interest to you.

You may be interested in some of our most visited web pages including:shoulder arthritis, total shoulder, ream and runreverse total shoulderCTA arthroplasty, and rotator cuff surgery as well as the 'ream and run essentials'